This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Thubten Gyatso, 13th Dalai Lama redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does anybody else think the external link above would be helpful? I have posted it to this article, but it was removed by Hottentot. Please give an opinion. I personally, believe that the link is extremely relavent to the article.-- FT in Leeds 02:30, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
Does that mean Russia and Britain also want to control that land? As far as I know Tibet was part of China at that time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.114.254 ( talk • contribs) 15:51, 28 December 2005
Image:Hhdl-13-lg.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 18:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Please rephrase. Our article (and I believe it to be correct, implies that Puyi was two in late 1908; the agency here is misplaced. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I question the veracity and neutrality of the whole section. It appears that the Chinese were trying to impress their borders to the British and not the Tibetans hence the whole section doesn't make sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.193.192 ( talk) 04:05, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Many of 13th Dalai Lama's programs were utter flops due to ultra conservative monks. Let's keep this from being a Tibetan propaganda page, oy? Not that I'm throwing weight behind the view that the lamas were PYOOOOOR EEEEEEEVIL, but let's keep this shit objective, aight?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.181.250.49 ( talk)
The image Image:DalaiLama-13 lg.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 19:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
That is questioned. What he said in the declaration? Could someone provide the Declaration? (Is it 告民众书??) In 1912, many pronvince of Qing were declare independence from Qing(NOT China), but 13th Dailai didn't. -- 刻意 21:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Anyway, 13th Dalai Lama was a complicated figure in history. Now the article give a misleading message and NPOV.
Thanks to God, the british india was not Russia(and Tibet was not Out Momgol).-- 刻意 12:30, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
I've searched the entire section that was tagged, and haven't found anything to support the claim that it was supporting the POV of one group over another. I'm taking the tag off the article. Drew Smith 11:01, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
How can you tell that Qing invaded a area that is belonged to itself? Suggest rewrite. Wwbread ( talk) 13:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Thubten Gyatso, 13th Dalai Lama redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does anybody else think the external link above would be helpful? I have posted it to this article, but it was removed by Hottentot. Please give an opinion. I personally, believe that the link is extremely relavent to the article.-- FT in Leeds 02:30, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
Does that mean Russia and Britain also want to control that land? As far as I know Tibet was part of China at that time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.114.254 ( talk • contribs) 15:51, 28 December 2005
Image:Hhdl-13-lg.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 18:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Please rephrase. Our article (and I believe it to be correct, implies that Puyi was two in late 1908; the agency here is misplaced. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I question the veracity and neutrality of the whole section. It appears that the Chinese were trying to impress their borders to the British and not the Tibetans hence the whole section doesn't make sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.193.192 ( talk) 04:05, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Many of 13th Dalai Lama's programs were utter flops due to ultra conservative monks. Let's keep this from being a Tibetan propaganda page, oy? Not that I'm throwing weight behind the view that the lamas were PYOOOOOR EEEEEEEVIL, but let's keep this shit objective, aight?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.181.250.49 ( talk)
The image Image:DalaiLama-13 lg.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 19:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
That is questioned. What he said in the declaration? Could someone provide the Declaration? (Is it 告民众书??) In 1912, many pronvince of Qing were declare independence from Qing(NOT China), but 13th Dailai didn't. -- 刻意 21:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Anyway, 13th Dalai Lama was a complicated figure in history. Now the article give a misleading message and NPOV.
Thanks to God, the british india was not Russia(and Tibet was not Out Momgol).-- 刻意 12:30, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
I've searched the entire section that was tagged, and haven't found anything to support the claim that it was supporting the POV of one group over another. I'm taking the tag off the article. Drew Smith 11:01, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
How can you tell that Qing invaded a area that is belonged to itself? Suggest rewrite. Wwbread ( talk) 13:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)