![]() | Thomas Tuchel has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 21, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
Bold textEMO DAMAGE HE SUCKS IMAGINE MANAGING THAT BAD
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Thomas tuchel manager 2.126.83.245 ( talk) 20:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Kosack ( talk · contribs) 10:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Paul, I'll be picking this one up. I'll get a review going as soon as possible.
Kosack (
talk)
10:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Initial review
Hi Paul, I'm going to pause here for now as there seems to be some serious sourcing issues here. A lot of the information doesn't seem to match up with the sources that it appears to be attributed to which is a cause for concern. Perhaps it's a simple fix or I'm not seeing how the layout is being presented? Kosack ( talk) 17:13, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
@
Kosack: Hello Kosack. I am moving slowly but progressively on the editing. I have fixed all issues for the lead, playing career, early managerial career, and the first two paragraphs of his Mainz spell. Could you look over that and confirm that the edits I made are acceptable?
My second request is that you point out which ref is called "ref 20" and "ref 21" - for me, it's confusing, since I added references since. Could you say for example "the Tifo Football video" or "the ESPN article", for example. It would help me a lot. Could you just go over the review and edit the refs number and add what the refs are called? Thanks.
Paul Vaurie (
talk)
02:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
@ Kosack: Hello Kosack! I have almost finished the PSG section. Could you please specify what you refer to when you say source 88? The "version" you linked above has weird reference numbers and they didn't match with your review. Also, can you get ahead on the Chelsea section and other sections? Thanks! Paul Vaurie ( talk) 01:41, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Paul Vaurie: I will be taking up this review. I will be having a look at the previous comments over the next few days. Below are my comments on the sections that weren't covered in the initial review. REDMAN 2019 ( talk) 13:25, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
@ REDMAN 2019: Done! Paul Vaurie ( talk) 20:24, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Not really anything wrong here.
I'm a fan of Chelsea and also my favorite. I have to add your group because of knows information. 43.245.121.252 ( talk) 17:09, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
I am not sure how and when this happened, but I assume it must have happened during an edit.
Currently the penultimate paragraph in the chapter headed "2022–23: Final season with Chelsea", begins with the following sentence:
"Tuchel, and Boehly was said to have described Tuchel as a "nightmare" to deal with on recruitment to a Premier League executive."
Clearly, some half-sentence either starting or ending in "Tuchel" was removed at the front, leaving the whole sentence as a bit of gibberish. As there is a footnote attached to "Tuchel", I assume that whoever made the edit left the name stranded in order to not delete/destroy the footnote, but then failed to return and amend or rewrite the sentence?
![]() | Thomas Tuchel has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 21, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
Bold textEMO DAMAGE HE SUCKS IMAGINE MANAGING THAT BAD
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Thomas tuchel manager 2.126.83.245 ( talk) 20:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Kosack ( talk · contribs) 10:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Paul, I'll be picking this one up. I'll get a review going as soon as possible.
Kosack (
talk)
10:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Initial review
Hi Paul, I'm going to pause here for now as there seems to be some serious sourcing issues here. A lot of the information doesn't seem to match up with the sources that it appears to be attributed to which is a cause for concern. Perhaps it's a simple fix or I'm not seeing how the layout is being presented? Kosack ( talk) 17:13, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
@
Kosack: Hello Kosack. I am moving slowly but progressively on the editing. I have fixed all issues for the lead, playing career, early managerial career, and the first two paragraphs of his Mainz spell. Could you look over that and confirm that the edits I made are acceptable?
My second request is that you point out which ref is called "ref 20" and "ref 21" - for me, it's confusing, since I added references since. Could you say for example "the Tifo Football video" or "the ESPN article", for example. It would help me a lot. Could you just go over the review and edit the refs number and add what the refs are called? Thanks.
Paul Vaurie (
talk)
02:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
@ Kosack: Hello Kosack! I have almost finished the PSG section. Could you please specify what you refer to when you say source 88? The "version" you linked above has weird reference numbers and they didn't match with your review. Also, can you get ahead on the Chelsea section and other sections? Thanks! Paul Vaurie ( talk) 01:41, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Paul Vaurie: I will be taking up this review. I will be having a look at the previous comments over the next few days. Below are my comments on the sections that weren't covered in the initial review. REDMAN 2019 ( talk) 13:25, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
@ REDMAN 2019: Done! Paul Vaurie ( talk) 20:24, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Not really anything wrong here.
I'm a fan of Chelsea and also my favorite. I have to add your group because of knows information. 43.245.121.252 ( talk) 17:09, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
I am not sure how and when this happened, but I assume it must have happened during an edit.
Currently the penultimate paragraph in the chapter headed "2022–23: Final season with Chelsea", begins with the following sentence:
"Tuchel, and Boehly was said to have described Tuchel as a "nightmare" to deal with on recruitment to a Premier League executive."
Clearly, some half-sentence either starting or ending in "Tuchel" was removed at the front, leaving the whole sentence as a bit of gibberish. As there is a footnote attached to "Tuchel", I assume that whoever made the edit left the name stranded in order to not delete/destroy the footnote, but then failed to return and amend or rewrite the sentence?