This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Thomas Merton article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has a great deal of unnecessary detail about Merton's early life, which would be fine for a biography but isn't needed here. And it has far too little detail about his work, which is the whole reason the article exists in the first place. -- MiguelMunoz ( talk) 20:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC) This is... a biography. But I agree about adding more about his work. Elizium23 ( talk) 20:18, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Someone has this month put a "story" template on this article. I don't think that is fair criticism: I find the article reads well, though it is perhaps a bit long. Deipnosophista ( talk) 13:55, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Thomas Merton was an American citizen all his life. A user is trying to present him as Catalan because he said: "I imagined myself a Catalan by birth". He wasn`t saying that he was a Catalan and its absurd to call him that. Mistico ( talk) 17:54, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
..................................................... The Spirituality beyond Catholicism section in the article is quite good. However, there is no mention of the fact that a large number of conservative Catholics objected to his interest in these topics. I find that to be a serious lacking. In my own contact with Catholic clergy and monastics, I never encountered any interest in non-Catholic spirituality in the US, although I did encounter it in the Philippines, where an interest in zen is sometimes expressed among Catholic clergy. To fully understand Merton's legacy (as discussed in the Legacy section of the article), some attention to the opposition to Merton's interest in this topic would improve the article. 184.180.87.188 ( talk) 15:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a collection of biographies. At least half of this article should be edited away. Joreberg ( talk) 18:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Really just scores of young men were influenced by his book to join monasteries? A score is 20, so scores sounds fairly paltry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.80.171.57 ( talk) 17:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
The Seven Storey Mountain is the work of a man I have never even heard of." /info/en/?search=The_Seven_Storey_Mountain Later Life and Criticism. 58.96.236.60 ( talk) 13:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Has the 2018 book by Turley and Martin been discussed much in academic circles? I notice it was self-published through Amazon's CreateSpace. While it's obviously possible for a book to struggle to find a conventional publisher because of inflammatory content, but I'd like to know more about how it's been received. Is it self published because it's controversial, or because it's crankery?
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Thomas Merton article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has a great deal of unnecessary detail about Merton's early life, which would be fine for a biography but isn't needed here. And it has far too little detail about his work, which is the whole reason the article exists in the first place. -- MiguelMunoz ( talk) 20:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC) This is... a biography. But I agree about adding more about his work. Elizium23 ( talk) 20:18, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Someone has this month put a "story" template on this article. I don't think that is fair criticism: I find the article reads well, though it is perhaps a bit long. Deipnosophista ( talk) 13:55, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Thomas Merton was an American citizen all his life. A user is trying to present him as Catalan because he said: "I imagined myself a Catalan by birth". He wasn`t saying that he was a Catalan and its absurd to call him that. Mistico ( talk) 17:54, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
..................................................... The Spirituality beyond Catholicism section in the article is quite good. However, there is no mention of the fact that a large number of conservative Catholics objected to his interest in these topics. I find that to be a serious lacking. In my own contact with Catholic clergy and monastics, I never encountered any interest in non-Catholic spirituality in the US, although I did encounter it in the Philippines, where an interest in zen is sometimes expressed among Catholic clergy. To fully understand Merton's legacy (as discussed in the Legacy section of the article), some attention to the opposition to Merton's interest in this topic would improve the article. 184.180.87.188 ( talk) 15:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a collection of biographies. At least half of this article should be edited away. Joreberg ( talk) 18:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Really just scores of young men were influenced by his book to join monasteries? A score is 20, so scores sounds fairly paltry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.80.171.57 ( talk) 17:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
The Seven Storey Mountain is the work of a man I have never even heard of." /info/en/?search=The_Seven_Storey_Mountain Later Life and Criticism. 58.96.236.60 ( talk) 13:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Has the 2018 book by Turley and Martin been discussed much in academic circles? I notice it was self-published through Amazon's CreateSpace. While it's obviously possible for a book to struggle to find a conventional publisher because of inflammatory content, but I'd like to know more about how it's been received. Is it self published because it's controversial, or because it's crankery?