This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Geology Low‑importance Talk:Thomas Jamieson is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Scotland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The newspaper biography of 1899 (see references) makes no mention of any connection to geology. Is this article confusing two individuals with the same name? -- Krsmith ( talk) 07:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Yes - I've removed the part you refer to, which related to Thomas Jamieson b. 11 Sept 1848, d. 3 May 1924, an analytical chemist in Aberdeen. The newspaper article is incorrect. I traced both Jamiesons in the 1891 census and other documents. Pynicola ( talk) 16:00, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply