Thomas Highgate has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 1, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Thomas Highgate appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 24 March 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
gamekeeper is it a typo ? ThePro ( talk) 15:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Background [Born the only son of a farm labourer...]
Memorial [His mother, who lived in Sidcup, Kent, lost three sons in the war...]
It might be that his father was not the father of the brothers, or there might be a mistake in here. MaxMad ( talk) 17:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I noticed that, too. Have you learned anything in the four years since you posted? Gamle Kvitrafn ( talk) 21:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 02:33, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Most of the issues are minor copy edits. One reference is redundantly cited. And that's it. 7-day hold to
Unexpectedlydian; ping me when done.
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c) 02:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Earwig flags a few unavoidable formulations and quotes from Putkowski. No issue here.
Five references were chosen for random spot checks: with no issues.
Encouragement: Archive references with IABot (which is down right now).
There are two images, both in a gallery at the end of the last section, of the war memorials in Shoreham and Sidcup. They are both under CC licenses. Alt text is supplied by the template for the former and specifically for the latter.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk) 00:43, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Unexpectedlydian ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 17:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Thomas Highgate, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: A good article, passes earwig and is adequately sourced. No close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is interesting, cited inline, and verified. QPQ done. Nom good to go. Pseud 14 ( talk) 21:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Thomas Highgate has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 1, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Thomas Highgate appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 24 March 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
gamekeeper is it a typo ? ThePro ( talk) 15:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Background [Born the only son of a farm labourer...]
Memorial [His mother, who lived in Sidcup, Kent, lost three sons in the war...]
It might be that his father was not the father of the brothers, or there might be a mistake in here. MaxMad ( talk) 17:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I noticed that, too. Have you learned anything in the four years since you posted? Gamle Kvitrafn ( talk) 21:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 02:33, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Most of the issues are minor copy edits. One reference is redundantly cited. And that's it. 7-day hold to
Unexpectedlydian; ping me when done.
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c) 02:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Earwig flags a few unavoidable formulations and quotes from Putkowski. No issue here.
Five references were chosen for random spot checks: with no issues.
Encouragement: Archive references with IABot (which is down right now).
There are two images, both in a gallery at the end of the last section, of the war memorials in Shoreham and Sidcup. They are both under CC licenses. Alt text is supplied by the template for the former and specifically for the latter.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk) 00:43, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Unexpectedlydian ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 17:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Thomas Highgate, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: A good article, passes earwig and is adequately sourced. No close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is interesting, cited inline, and verified. QPQ done. Nom good to go. Pseud 14 ( talk) 21:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)