GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs)
19:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Nominator:
Ryan Vesey
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Issues identified below. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Issues identified below. |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | The "References" section is fine. |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Issues identified below. This is the biggest problem with the article. |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | Since so much is unsourced, I can't tell. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Not a problem. |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Not a problem. |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Not a problem. |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Not a problem. |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Issue identified below. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Not a problem. |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
{{
PD-old-70}}
would be fine though.I understand the nominator is on Wikibreak. I'm going to close this as a non-successful nomination at this time. If you later fix these problems, feel free to renominate. – Quadell ( talk) 13:08, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs)
19:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Nominator:
Ryan Vesey
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Issues identified below. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Issues identified below. |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | The "References" section is fine. |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Issues identified below. This is the biggest problem with the article. |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | Since so much is unsourced, I can't tell. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Not a problem. |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Not a problem. |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Not a problem. |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Not a problem. |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Issue identified below. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Not a problem. |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
{{
PD-old-70}}
would be fine though.I understand the nominator is on Wikibreak. I'm going to close this as a non-successful nomination at this time. If you later fix these problems, feel free to renominate. – Quadell ( talk) 13:08, 19 October 2011 (UTC)