Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Sorry, but I'm going to quick-fail this article primarily because of the lack of sources. Two references is simply not enough to substantiate everything claimed in a good article, and there are many other things that need to be fixed before this can be promoted.
This article will need a lot more work to get to GA status, but it can be done. MOS:FILM is a great page outlining what a decent film article should look like, which you may find useful. If you need any help, feel free to leave me a message or ask the Film WikiProject's participants at WT:FILM. Good luck with improving the article! — 97198 ( talk) 07:42, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Has too many details and no cites. Parkwells ( talk) 16:55, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Sorry, but I'm going to quick-fail this article primarily because of the lack of sources. Two references is simply not enough to substantiate everything claimed in a good article, and there are many other things that need to be fixed before this can be promoted.
This article will need a lot more work to get to GA status, but it can be done. MOS:FILM is a great page outlining what a decent film article should look like, which you may find useful. If you need any help, feel free to leave me a message or ask the Film WikiProject's participants at WT:FILM. Good luck with improving the article! — 97198 ( talk) 07:42, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Has too many details and no cites. Parkwells ( talk) 16:55, 29 May 2013 (UTC)