This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Third circle of hell article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Third circle of hell has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 1, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | On 17 December 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Third Circle of Hell. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
![]() | A fact from Third circle of hell appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 30 December 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk)
19:14, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Created by Grapple X ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC).
To T:DYK/P5
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:36, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
– The individual circles are all proper nouns, which are capitalized this way in most reliable sources that review Dante's work. I think that WP:COMMONNAME would compel us to capitalize two additional letters in each of these titles compared to their current place. — Mhawk10 ( talk) 03:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
only words and phrases that are consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources are capitalized in Wikipedia.Looking at ngram evidence: first circle of hell second circle of hell third circle of hell and a google scholar search, we are seeing mixed usage in sources for the uncapped form, the title case form and capitalising "hell". This is particularly so, if we consider the more recent usage. Actual evidence does not bear out the assertion by the OP. Either capitalised forms fall well short of the threshold in the guidance by which we would cap them. Regards, Cinderella157 ( talk) 00:20, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Gabriel Yuji ( talk · contribs) 21:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Just for the sake of record, I've read through
Talk:First circle of hell/GA1 and
Talk:Second circle of hell/GA1 to have a starting point. Like those reviews, I wasn't able to find major errors in the article. I do have some minor questions, however; they are:
So that's it. It's an excellent article overall. No copyvios found. It's well-sourced and uses academic sources so no questions here. Please me ping after you've already solved the problems or replied to the ones you don't think are issues at all. Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 21:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Third circle of hell article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Third circle of hell has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 1, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | On 17 December 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Third Circle of Hell. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
![]() | A fact from Third circle of hell appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 30 December 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk)
19:14, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Created by Grapple X ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC).
To T:DYK/P5
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:36, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
– The individual circles are all proper nouns, which are capitalized this way in most reliable sources that review Dante's work. I think that WP:COMMONNAME would compel us to capitalize two additional letters in each of these titles compared to their current place. — Mhawk10 ( talk) 03:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
only words and phrases that are consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources are capitalized in Wikipedia.Looking at ngram evidence: first circle of hell second circle of hell third circle of hell and a google scholar search, we are seeing mixed usage in sources for the uncapped form, the title case form and capitalising "hell". This is particularly so, if we consider the more recent usage. Actual evidence does not bear out the assertion by the OP. Either capitalised forms fall well short of the threshold in the guidance by which we would cap them. Regards, Cinderella157 ( talk) 00:20, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Gabriel Yuji ( talk · contribs) 21:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Just for the sake of record, I've read through
Talk:First circle of hell/GA1 and
Talk:Second circle of hell/GA1 to have a starting point. Like those reviews, I wasn't able to find major errors in the article. I do have some minor questions, however; they are:
So that's it. It's an excellent article overall. No copyvios found. It's well-sourced and uses academic sources so no questions here. Please me ping after you've already solved the problems or replied to the ones you don't think are issues at all. Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 21:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)