![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Theodore Lukens was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
Per request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment, I'm leaving a few comments here on how I think that this can become B-Class.
- Drilnoth ( talk) 02:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
I have put a great deal of effort and have suffered a great deal of abuse from my editor/husband to write this new version of this biography on Lukens. The old version is available from the page history list, to compare differences. I hope that the other editors agree that this is a much better story, both in layout and content. Enjoy! Marcia Wright ( talk) 21:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Hekerui ( talk) 09:56, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Reviewer: Wizardman 23:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey. To start off with, I'm concerned about the structure of this article in general. The way it's split feels rather odd for a bio article. It starts off by pointing out different aspects of what he's done (reforestation, etc.) However, there's no chronology to it, especially considering that early life is near the end.
What I could do is read it through, and if it makes sense despite this, then I'll continue. Otherwise, it's a possible fail as is. For a start, at least move early life first. Wizardman 23:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
It's a very nice article, but the citation issues combined with the structure lead me to fail the article. What I would do is fix these issues, put the article up for a peer review, then bring it back to GAN; it should pass fairly easily at that point. (IMO cite adding is a lot easier to do than prose issues, and your prose is perfectly fine) Wizardman 17:27, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Why is Helen Lukens or rather Helen Lukens Jones not a separate article? She is Theodore Lukens' daughter but she published work in her own name. It made finding information on her a bit more difficult. X13007 ( talk) 22:04, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Theodore Lukens was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
Per request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment, I'm leaving a few comments here on how I think that this can become B-Class.
- Drilnoth ( talk) 02:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
I have put a great deal of effort and have suffered a great deal of abuse from my editor/husband to write this new version of this biography on Lukens. The old version is available from the page history list, to compare differences. I hope that the other editors agree that this is a much better story, both in layout and content. Enjoy! Marcia Wright ( talk) 21:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Hekerui ( talk) 09:56, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Reviewer: Wizardman 23:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey. To start off with, I'm concerned about the structure of this article in general. The way it's split feels rather odd for a bio article. It starts off by pointing out different aspects of what he's done (reforestation, etc.) However, there's no chronology to it, especially considering that early life is near the end.
What I could do is read it through, and if it makes sense despite this, then I'll continue. Otherwise, it's a possible fail as is. For a start, at least move early life first. Wizardman 23:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
It's a very nice article, but the citation issues combined with the structure lead me to fail the article. What I would do is fix these issues, put the article up for a peer review, then bring it back to GAN; it should pass fairly easily at that point. (IMO cite adding is a lot easier to do than prose issues, and your prose is perfectly fine) Wizardman 17:27, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Why is Helen Lukens or rather Helen Lukens Jones not a separate article? She is Theodore Lukens' daughter but she published work in her own name. It made finding information on her a bit more difficult. X13007 ( talk) 22:04, 10 January 2019 (UTC)