GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Puffin Let's talk! 13:41, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
1. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct? Done - Certainly
2. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation? Not done - Take a look at words to watch and list incorporation. Across the whole article.
3. It provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout? Done - However, there is an invalid ref tag. Check the references at the bottom of the page.
4. It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines? Done
5. It contains no original research? Done
6. It addresses the main aspects of the topic? Done - Certainly
7. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail? Not done - Very long, too much detail like ratings. Maybe cut down the article as it is very long.
8. It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each? Done
9. It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute? Not done - A few edit wars?
10. Illustrated, if possible, by images: Done - Some of bad quality/angles.
(a) Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content? Done
(b) Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions? Done - Again, could be better.
Pass or fail? Placing on hold for issues to be addressed.
Change the ref tag, maybe improve the images, cut down the article length, a few words are not supposed to be used according to the manual of style, however, there is very few of them so this isn't compulsory. Ok? Puffin Let's talk! 14:03, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
If the second opinion request is on the separate article, then I agree that that's a bad move. Keep it all in one. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:02, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
I personally think One Direction should be mentioned in the lead, their the global breakout of 7th series. thoughts? AdabowtheSecond ( talk) 00:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Puffin Let's talk! 13:41, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
1. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct? Done - Certainly
2. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation? Not done - Take a look at words to watch and list incorporation. Across the whole article.
3. It provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout? Done - However, there is an invalid ref tag. Check the references at the bottom of the page.
4. It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines? Done
5. It contains no original research? Done
6. It addresses the main aspects of the topic? Done - Certainly
7. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail? Not done - Very long, too much detail like ratings. Maybe cut down the article as it is very long.
8. It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each? Done
9. It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute? Not done - A few edit wars?
10. Illustrated, if possible, by images: Done - Some of bad quality/angles.
(a) Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content? Done
(b) Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions? Done - Again, could be better.
Pass or fail? Placing on hold for issues to be addressed.
Change the ref tag, maybe improve the images, cut down the article length, a few words are not supposed to be used according to the manual of style, however, there is very few of them so this isn't compulsory. Ok? Puffin Let's talk! 14:03, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
If the second opinion request is on the separate article, then I agree that that's a bad move. Keep it all in one. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:02, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
I personally think One Direction should be mentioned in the lead, their the global breakout of 7th series. thoughts? AdabowtheSecond ( talk) 00:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)