This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The X Factor (British TV series) series 13 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should he be included since he was only a guest judge for one person or not? -- MSalmon ( talk) 20:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Do we really need this long list of unsourced names, most of whom are barely notable and forgotten about since their last auditions, and some of whom may never have had their previous auditions shown at the time? At least, anyone who didn't reach judges' houses previously should probably be removed. Ryan and Aalto are worth including though, as they are both notable people. I'm going to remove the ones who only made bootcamp in their previous audition, but I think we should also remove the six-chair challenge ones. anemone projectors 17:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Is anyone going to add the 4 weeks worth of ratings? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.80.171.211 ( talk) 14:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
I've not watched it yet but someone said the number of performances shown wasn't the number of contestants, so it was removed. However, in the bootcamp episode when the contestants found out their mentors, they had a shot of all the contestants in the rooms. There were 14 girls, 14 boys, 17 over 25s and I couldn't count the groups. anemone projectors 11:44, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request to
The X Factor (UK series 13) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Zjaakkima ( talk) 22:41, 30 September 2016 (UTC) Contestans Saara Aalto is Misspelled As Saara Alto at some occasions
Technically, Brooks Way were disqualified, they didn't withdraw.
Dangold426 ( talk) 20:41, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
The colour we're currently using for the lifeline vote for Freddy is the same colour we use as the winner in the final, I think we need a different colour. ThisIsDanny ( talk) 22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
To begin, I apologise for not responding more promptly. I am not a frequent Wikipedia editor but I change what I feel is aesthetically best and most appropriate to the despondency of the article. Use of the orange colour is abrupt, ominous and quite frankly sticks out like a sore thumb. Using #DACEF2 fits more with the article. The lilac shade IS different to that of the colour used for the Withdrawal of Brooks Way - yet still fits with the colour scheme and hence makes the article more cohesive, articulate, consistent and aesthetically pleasing. I urge you to keep it this way. With regards to 'Saved' - it just makes sense. The description of the colour is given above the Results Summary, by the colour key. There is no need to describe the scenario. It is already in the key. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irin161 ( talk • contribs) 17:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
I am still extremely unhappy about the use of "Bottom three; saved by lifeline vote". It's just way too long and it already describes in the colour key (still think that colour is horrendous). It needs to be changed to just 'Saved' as it says enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irin161 ( talk • contribs) 21:21, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
The lifeline vote also makes it impossible to know any placing before the final results are revealed. Ryan could have been in 11th place in the main vote but still saved by the lifeline vote. Currently Freddie is marked as 11th and Saara as 10th these need to changed to Bottom Three. Sagand42 ( talk) 23:45, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm not convinced that it is notable criticism when social media users criticise a particular act. For the sake of neutrality in the article, we should either include praise and criticism for all acts, or remove the section completely, or we should stick to what professional reviewers have said, rather than lazy news reports of what random people have said online. The same for professional artists - if it's against the rules then it's controversial, but it's not so is mentioning the criticism necessary? If so, we need to establish, for the sake of neutrality in the article, that no rules have been broken, or again, remove this section. anemone projectors 14:41, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request to
The X Factor (UK series 13) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
You can find it on the channel. Dermot didn't say anything, but it was revealed on the YT channel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.105.230.103 ( talk) 05:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_TY4Gf2lAE might change your mind — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.191.103.91 ( talk) 08:58, 16 November 2016
Are these figures not being released at all? If no, should we just remove the column from the ratings table? anemone projectors 16:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Can the current 28-day ratings from BARB be removed and reverted to the standard 7-day data please, all past 12 series use the normal 7-day data so why is series 13 so special and the data is much far ahead publicised. I would do it myself but I don't want to get into any edit conflict arguments with people that think this page is only theirs to edit so thought it best to ask on Talk Page first. Superdry19 ( talk) 03:40, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
The table was changed to include the three separate 28-day ratings, which is fine. I don't see any point in adding 7-day ratings now, but if we do, it'll mean 6 columns of ratings. anemone projectors 08:10, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Please can the following be added:
A simple question: Live Week 7:
Added information: Boris The Teeth Guy 7 "You've Got a Friend in Me" Toy Story Safe Sing-off ???!!!???
WHAT?!?!
Boris The Teeth Guy was The X Factor UK Series 4. And eliminated Judge's Houses!!! Also Boris The Teeth Guy was NOT series 13.
188.238.44.203 ( talk) 00:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The X Factor (British TV series) series 13 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should he be included since he was only a guest judge for one person or not? -- MSalmon ( talk) 20:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Do we really need this long list of unsourced names, most of whom are barely notable and forgotten about since their last auditions, and some of whom may never have had their previous auditions shown at the time? At least, anyone who didn't reach judges' houses previously should probably be removed. Ryan and Aalto are worth including though, as they are both notable people. I'm going to remove the ones who only made bootcamp in their previous audition, but I think we should also remove the six-chair challenge ones. anemone projectors 17:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Is anyone going to add the 4 weeks worth of ratings? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.80.171.211 ( talk) 14:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
I've not watched it yet but someone said the number of performances shown wasn't the number of contestants, so it was removed. However, in the bootcamp episode when the contestants found out their mentors, they had a shot of all the contestants in the rooms. There were 14 girls, 14 boys, 17 over 25s and I couldn't count the groups. anemone projectors 11:44, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request to
The X Factor (UK series 13) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Zjaakkima ( talk) 22:41, 30 September 2016 (UTC) Contestans Saara Aalto is Misspelled As Saara Alto at some occasions
Technically, Brooks Way were disqualified, they didn't withdraw.
Dangold426 ( talk) 20:41, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
The colour we're currently using for the lifeline vote for Freddy is the same colour we use as the winner in the final, I think we need a different colour. ThisIsDanny ( talk) 22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
To begin, I apologise for not responding more promptly. I am not a frequent Wikipedia editor but I change what I feel is aesthetically best and most appropriate to the despondency of the article. Use of the orange colour is abrupt, ominous and quite frankly sticks out like a sore thumb. Using #DACEF2 fits more with the article. The lilac shade IS different to that of the colour used for the Withdrawal of Brooks Way - yet still fits with the colour scheme and hence makes the article more cohesive, articulate, consistent and aesthetically pleasing. I urge you to keep it this way. With regards to 'Saved' - it just makes sense. The description of the colour is given above the Results Summary, by the colour key. There is no need to describe the scenario. It is already in the key. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irin161 ( talk • contribs) 17:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
I am still extremely unhappy about the use of "Bottom three; saved by lifeline vote". It's just way too long and it already describes in the colour key (still think that colour is horrendous). It needs to be changed to just 'Saved' as it says enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irin161 ( talk • contribs) 21:21, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
The lifeline vote also makes it impossible to know any placing before the final results are revealed. Ryan could have been in 11th place in the main vote but still saved by the lifeline vote. Currently Freddie is marked as 11th and Saara as 10th these need to changed to Bottom Three. Sagand42 ( talk) 23:45, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm not convinced that it is notable criticism when social media users criticise a particular act. For the sake of neutrality in the article, we should either include praise and criticism for all acts, or remove the section completely, or we should stick to what professional reviewers have said, rather than lazy news reports of what random people have said online. The same for professional artists - if it's against the rules then it's controversial, but it's not so is mentioning the criticism necessary? If so, we need to establish, for the sake of neutrality in the article, that no rules have been broken, or again, remove this section. anemone projectors 14:41, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request to
The X Factor (UK series 13) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
You can find it on the channel. Dermot didn't say anything, but it was revealed on the YT channel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.105.230.103 ( talk) 05:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_TY4Gf2lAE might change your mind — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.191.103.91 ( talk) 08:58, 16 November 2016
Are these figures not being released at all? If no, should we just remove the column from the ratings table? anemone projectors 16:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Can the current 28-day ratings from BARB be removed and reverted to the standard 7-day data please, all past 12 series use the normal 7-day data so why is series 13 so special and the data is much far ahead publicised. I would do it myself but I don't want to get into any edit conflict arguments with people that think this page is only theirs to edit so thought it best to ask on Talk Page first. Superdry19 ( talk) 03:40, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
The table was changed to include the three separate 28-day ratings, which is fine. I don't see any point in adding 7-day ratings now, but if we do, it'll mean 6 columns of ratings. anemone projectors 08:10, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Please can the following be added:
A simple question: Live Week 7:
Added information: Boris The Teeth Guy 7 "You've Got a Friend in Me" Toy Story Safe Sing-off ???!!!???
WHAT?!?!
Boris The Teeth Guy was The X Factor UK Series 4. And eliminated Judge's Houses!!! Also Boris The Teeth Guy was NOT series 13.
188.238.44.203 ( talk) 00:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)