Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Comments
Looking forward to starting in on this review! As I go, I'll fix minor things myself (and of course you can always revert/rewrite those changes, and make comments below with bigger concerns that I'll bounce back to you for edits.
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 18:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply
To comply with
MOS:LEAD, the lead should serve as a summary of the article as a whole, but the majority of the article information is not mentioned there. This is often quick to fix, but you should talk a look at each of the article's sections and make sure their key points are summarized in the lead.
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 18:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply
In terms of prose and breadth, it feels very unbalanced to have a single sentence in the "themes" section. Personally, I'd use the reception section just for the awards, and use all the cited reviews to build out, instead, a more robust "themes" section. The two key themes I'm seeing, based on the quotes from the reviews, are post-Apartheid politics and female friendship.
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 18:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Actually, I've just completed a spot-check of sources, and did some initial prose edits myself based on what I found. I'd say now that the "themes" section should probably be one paragraph on apartheid and one paragraph on aging and/or grief. I also think there's enough in the sources for a short "style" section, which I got started. Let me know if you want any more advice on how to proceed in repurposing the reviews from "reception" to organize them into these sections.
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 22:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
LEvalyn, thank you for your wonderful work! I don’t know how it happened but I’ve not been able to write constructive sentences for some days. I asked around, they said it’s “writer’s block” or something similar. Lol. I’ll reread the reviews now and see what I can flesh out. Best,
Reading Beans 04:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The development section is really great! A lot of book articles leave this information out so I wanted to specifically say that I appreciate the work here :)
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 18:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The plot reads a bit too much like a blurb rather than a summary, i.e., it leaves out the details of the main conflict and how it is resolved at the end (you may find
WP:PLOTSUM helpful)
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 18:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Comments
Looking forward to starting in on this review! As I go, I'll fix minor things myself (and of course you can always revert/rewrite those changes, and make comments below with bigger concerns that I'll bounce back to you for edits.
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 18:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply
To comply with
MOS:LEAD, the lead should serve as a summary of the article as a whole, but the majority of the article information is not mentioned there. This is often quick to fix, but you should talk a look at each of the article's sections and make sure their key points are summarized in the lead.
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 18:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply
In terms of prose and breadth, it feels very unbalanced to have a single sentence in the "themes" section. Personally, I'd use the reception section just for the awards, and use all the cited reviews to build out, instead, a more robust "themes" section. The two key themes I'm seeing, based on the quotes from the reviews, are post-Apartheid politics and female friendship.
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 18:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Actually, I've just completed a spot-check of sources, and did some initial prose edits myself based on what I found. I'd say now that the "themes" section should probably be one paragraph on apartheid and one paragraph on aging and/or grief. I also think there's enough in the sources for a short "style" section, which I got started. Let me know if you want any more advice on how to proceed in repurposing the reviews from "reception" to organize them into these sections.
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 22:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
LEvalyn, thank you for your wonderful work! I don’t know how it happened but I’ve not been able to write constructive sentences for some days. I asked around, they said it’s “writer’s block” or something similar. Lol. I’ll reread the reviews now and see what I can flesh out. Best,
Reading Beans 04:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The development section is really great! A lot of book articles leave this information out so I wanted to specifically say that I appreciate the work here :)
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 18:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The plot reads a bit too much like a blurb rather than a summary, i.e., it leaves out the details of the main conflict and how it is resolved at the end (you may find
WP:PLOTSUM helpful)
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 18:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply