This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I am something of an inclusionist, and thus I disagree with this reversion. If the list discussed is a list by a renowned newspaper like The Guardian, I see no reason why it is necessary to remove a discussion of even the 50th play, for example, ranking 50th. AndrewOne ( talk) 23:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I am something of an inclusionist, and thus I disagree with this reversion. If the list discussed is a list by a renowned newspaper like The Guardian, I see no reason why it is necessary to remove a discussion of even the 50th play, for example, ranking 50th. AndrewOne ( talk) 23:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)