From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 ( talk · contribs) 17:39, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Review

  • No dablinks.
  • No problem with exlinks.
Lead
  • Extended with some info to properly cover the AB.
Plot
  • Some minor fixes.
Reception
  • Some minor fixes.
Refs
  • Okay

I've reviewed the article and fixed all minor (and some major but irrelevant) issues on it. I think i've left nothing behind, so i'm passing the article. — Hahc 21 23:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Verdict

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c ( OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Hahc 21 23:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 ( talk · contribs) 17:39, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Review

  • No dablinks.
  • No problem with exlinks.
Lead
  • Extended with some info to properly cover the AB.
Plot
  • Some minor fixes.
Reception
  • Some minor fixes.
Refs
  • Okay

I've reviewed the article and fixed all minor (and some major but irrelevant) issues on it. I think i've left nothing behind, so i'm passing the article. — Hahc 21 23:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Verdict

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c ( OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Hahc 21 23:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook