This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Velvet Underground article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
The Velvet Underground was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've moved the following section here as it appears to me not to be that useful. The musicians are all mentioned within the article, and if they are significant they are also listed in several places in the article - in the info box under Past members, in the Lineups section, and then again in the Timeline. Removing it, though, may be contentious, so I am placing it here for others to consider if it is worth discussing putting it back. SilkTork ✔Tea time 20:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
References
The two sources cited in the lead to support the statement that the band's subject matter, musical experimentation, and attitudes were influential in the development of punk and alternative music don't support that statement.
The first source, All Yesterday's Parties, is a collection of articles and reviews of the band. The page cited is a 1969 review by Lester Bangs of the third Velvet Underground album. In 1969, Bangs could not have written that the Velvet Underground would influence musical styles that had not yet been invented.
The second source, Post-Secular Philosophy, is a book about philosophy. The page cited doesn't mention the Velvet Underground, and according to Google Books, neither the word "Velvet" nor "Underground" appears elsewhere in the book.
Both sources have been in the article a very long time. — MShabazz Talk/ Stalk 13:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
There's a lot of "according to whom?" notifications on this article about some incredibly basic/obvious descriptions: "Reed's songs and singing are subdued and confessional in nature" [according to whom?] - anyone who's heard the album would agree with this statement and a source isn't required. "and two of Reed's best-known songs,[according to whom?] "Sweet Jane" and "Rock and Roll"." - both of these songs were singles taken off of Loaded and receieved AM radio play in 1971. Both of them were also staples of Reed's solo shows for YEARS. So again, we're not talking rocket-science "need to source sources" kind of observations here, please remove these "According to whom" notifications because they actually pollute the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.57.193.135 ( talk) 15:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
The page currently includes a photograph purporting to be Nico, captioned as follows: "Nico performing with Andy Warhol's Exploding Plastic Inevitable in Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1966". I am certain that this photo does not in fact depict Nico, but is actually Catherine James, who occasionally performed onstage with the Velvet Underground for their Exploding Plastic Inevitable shows. She was a model who hung out with the Factory clique for a while (as described in her book, "Dandelion; Memoir Of A Free Spirit"). The angle of the photograph obscures her face, which is probably why the error has been made.
Nico never wore dresses onstage with the Velvets, certainly not flowery patterns! She wore trouser suits. We can verify this was the case for the Ann Arbor show specifically, thanks to a news article covering the actual event: Velvet Underground Live at the Ann Arbor Film Festival, Detroit, Michigan, on the 12th of March 1966. The concert was reviewed by the Detroit Free Press on Tuesday 15 March 1966. The reviewer describes the show as, "a combination of film and live music and dance. While a beautiful blond girl sang, her image was projected on three separate 'screens,' including her own white jacket." The review is accessible online via Newspapers.com - https://www.newspapers.com/image/97864650/?terms=%22Festival%2C%2Band%2Bfilms%2Bby%2BWarhol%22
I recently edited the page to remove this misleading photograph, but it was reinstated on 19:37, 22 September 2020 by Wiki user Freshacconci. I would welcome any third party viewpoints to help resolve this dispute.
For additional reference, here are five photographs showing Nico's typical stage wear circa 1966:
https://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FEDHkFgOU0AI_yB1.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fdark_shark%2Fstatus%2F1166964567454257152&tbnid=LqHUUSsNrKF8XM&vet=10CAUQxiAoBWoXChMIkJ-o2KLB7AIVAAAAAB0AAAAAEAk..i&docid=huB50lRJ1f1_hM&w=940&h=852&itg=1&q=%22Velvet%20Underground%22%20Michigan&hl=en-GB&ved=0CAUQxiAoBWoXChMIkJ-o2KLB7AIVAAAAAB0AAAAAEAk#imgrc=fwtzTHv8KpFcKM&imgdii=j0mtBuEIkdlTnM — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvernon123 ( talk • contribs) 19:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Shouldn't they be called a British-American band because of John Cale? Bands such as Fleetwood Mac and the Foreigner are classified as British-American. GreatLakesShips ( talk) 18:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
No, because :Cale was living in New York prior to the band being formed there. Fleetwood Mac was originally a thoroughly British band that later began adding US members and operating out of California. Foreigner was formed by successful musicians from each country, rather than all of them being in one place when the idea for the band came up. Both are different situations than forming a band in the US that happens to include someone who had immigrated. Ixat totep ( talk) 01:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
I have added that Cale was Welsh. I hope that mitigates the issue. Travelmite ( talk) 03:00, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Per the article text, the post-Squeeze band (Yule plus Rob Norris, George Kay, and Mark Naussef) were considered The Velvet Underground as much as Squeeze was considered a Velvet Underground album. In the liner notes to Final V.U., Doug Yule describes the lineup as "traveling under the name of The Velvet Underground" but "was put together just for this tour by Steve Sesnick."
I think Norris, Kay, and Naussef should appear on the timeline (as Squeeze already does) from Oct-Dec 1972, although perhaps as live-only sidemen. Some band timelines show this by having the 11-wide bar be a bright yellow, with the regular instruments shown as a smaller width.
I don't think there's a need to include the 1973 "lineup" as Yule calls that aborted tour "a mistake" and the promoter used the VU name despite being told not to. Ixat totep ( talk) 01:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
plz see the Apple plus movie Elger lorenzsonn ( talk) 15:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
1. Doug Yule plays drums on Loaded. On "Sweet Jane" (to cite just one example) he plays all instruments except rhythm guitar. So drums 1970 should be added to his credits.
2. Nico is not a member. This is definitional. The first album is The Velvet Underground & Nico, indicating they are separate artists collaborating. Live shows should have been promoted as such, but even if some weren't the album speaks to membership quite plainly: "Nico" is distinct from "The Velvet Underground" and Nico should accordingly be removed from the members section. If she were a member rather than a distinct artist working as a collaborator, the album would just be called The Velvet Underground. The group's induction into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame also reflects as much (I understand the Hall doesn't determine official band membership; I'm just marshalling evidence). The omission of Doug Yule suggests The Velvet Underground & Nico is the cornerstone reason for the group's induction. So why not include Nico? Because she was not a member. 2603:7000:3400:29E1:F4D3:E70A:5AA:ADE8 ( talk) 14:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Faulty sentence construction.
Suggest change:
"MacLise was replaced by Moe Tucker in 1965, who played on most of the band's recordings."
To:
"In 1965 MacLise was replaced by Moe Tucker, who played on most of the band's recordings. 2A00:23C8:7B09:FA01:ECF0:2E16:36C5:3807 ( talk) 01:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Paul Morrissey became the manager of the Velvet Underground and was the one who first brought them to the Factory after being introduced to the band by Barbara Rubin and Gerard Malanga at the Café Bizarre in late 1965. Morrissey was the one who suggested that Nico become part of the band and helped to get them their record deal with Verve. Warhol "produced" the Velvet Underground in the sense that he paid for their equipment and put money into promotion, but Morrissey actually handled all the bookings, money, etc. Morrissey, Warhol and Reed formed a company together called Warvel, Inc. that was dissolved in late 1967 after Reed temporarily broke up the band after firing Cale.
Additionally, Morrissey co-conceived and named the Exploding Plastic Inevitable creating all the early publicity and advertising material surrounding the traveling multimedia show.
He also took numerous photos of the band, including the one on the famed February 1966 "Uptight" flyer and the color portrait shots of the band on the back cover of the debut LP.
There are numerous sources to back all of this up, starting with "Up-tight: The Velvet Underground Story" by Victor Bockris and Gerard Malanga (1983). XmchaikenX ( talk) 22:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
I'm really just trying to find a citation near the beginning of this article where there is some discussion about the naming of the band/project. In the passage it says something like: The band was named after this book by the same name, "The Velvet Underground." I'd simply like to more about that historical conversation in general. Thanks Trogsloth99 ( talk) 11:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Velvet Underground article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
The Velvet Underground was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've moved the following section here as it appears to me not to be that useful. The musicians are all mentioned within the article, and if they are significant they are also listed in several places in the article - in the info box under Past members, in the Lineups section, and then again in the Timeline. Removing it, though, may be contentious, so I am placing it here for others to consider if it is worth discussing putting it back. SilkTork ✔Tea time 20:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
References
The two sources cited in the lead to support the statement that the band's subject matter, musical experimentation, and attitudes were influential in the development of punk and alternative music don't support that statement.
The first source, All Yesterday's Parties, is a collection of articles and reviews of the band. The page cited is a 1969 review by Lester Bangs of the third Velvet Underground album. In 1969, Bangs could not have written that the Velvet Underground would influence musical styles that had not yet been invented.
The second source, Post-Secular Philosophy, is a book about philosophy. The page cited doesn't mention the Velvet Underground, and according to Google Books, neither the word "Velvet" nor "Underground" appears elsewhere in the book.
Both sources have been in the article a very long time. — MShabazz Talk/ Stalk 13:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
There's a lot of "according to whom?" notifications on this article about some incredibly basic/obvious descriptions: "Reed's songs and singing are subdued and confessional in nature" [according to whom?] - anyone who's heard the album would agree with this statement and a source isn't required. "and two of Reed's best-known songs,[according to whom?] "Sweet Jane" and "Rock and Roll"." - both of these songs were singles taken off of Loaded and receieved AM radio play in 1971. Both of them were also staples of Reed's solo shows for YEARS. So again, we're not talking rocket-science "need to source sources" kind of observations here, please remove these "According to whom" notifications because they actually pollute the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.57.193.135 ( talk) 15:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
The page currently includes a photograph purporting to be Nico, captioned as follows: "Nico performing with Andy Warhol's Exploding Plastic Inevitable in Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1966". I am certain that this photo does not in fact depict Nico, but is actually Catherine James, who occasionally performed onstage with the Velvet Underground for their Exploding Plastic Inevitable shows. She was a model who hung out with the Factory clique for a while (as described in her book, "Dandelion; Memoir Of A Free Spirit"). The angle of the photograph obscures her face, which is probably why the error has been made.
Nico never wore dresses onstage with the Velvets, certainly not flowery patterns! She wore trouser suits. We can verify this was the case for the Ann Arbor show specifically, thanks to a news article covering the actual event: Velvet Underground Live at the Ann Arbor Film Festival, Detroit, Michigan, on the 12th of March 1966. The concert was reviewed by the Detroit Free Press on Tuesday 15 March 1966. The reviewer describes the show as, "a combination of film and live music and dance. While a beautiful blond girl sang, her image was projected on three separate 'screens,' including her own white jacket." The review is accessible online via Newspapers.com - https://www.newspapers.com/image/97864650/?terms=%22Festival%2C%2Band%2Bfilms%2Bby%2BWarhol%22
I recently edited the page to remove this misleading photograph, but it was reinstated on 19:37, 22 September 2020 by Wiki user Freshacconci. I would welcome any third party viewpoints to help resolve this dispute.
For additional reference, here are five photographs showing Nico's typical stage wear circa 1966:
https://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FEDHkFgOU0AI_yB1.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fdark_shark%2Fstatus%2F1166964567454257152&tbnid=LqHUUSsNrKF8XM&vet=10CAUQxiAoBWoXChMIkJ-o2KLB7AIVAAAAAB0AAAAAEAk..i&docid=huB50lRJ1f1_hM&w=940&h=852&itg=1&q=%22Velvet%20Underground%22%20Michigan&hl=en-GB&ved=0CAUQxiAoBWoXChMIkJ-o2KLB7AIVAAAAAB0AAAAAEAk#imgrc=fwtzTHv8KpFcKM&imgdii=j0mtBuEIkdlTnM — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvernon123 ( talk • contribs) 19:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Shouldn't they be called a British-American band because of John Cale? Bands such as Fleetwood Mac and the Foreigner are classified as British-American. GreatLakesShips ( talk) 18:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
No, because :Cale was living in New York prior to the band being formed there. Fleetwood Mac was originally a thoroughly British band that later began adding US members and operating out of California. Foreigner was formed by successful musicians from each country, rather than all of them being in one place when the idea for the band came up. Both are different situations than forming a band in the US that happens to include someone who had immigrated. Ixat totep ( talk) 01:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
I have added that Cale was Welsh. I hope that mitigates the issue. Travelmite ( talk) 03:00, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Per the article text, the post-Squeeze band (Yule plus Rob Norris, George Kay, and Mark Naussef) were considered The Velvet Underground as much as Squeeze was considered a Velvet Underground album. In the liner notes to Final V.U., Doug Yule describes the lineup as "traveling under the name of The Velvet Underground" but "was put together just for this tour by Steve Sesnick."
I think Norris, Kay, and Naussef should appear on the timeline (as Squeeze already does) from Oct-Dec 1972, although perhaps as live-only sidemen. Some band timelines show this by having the 11-wide bar be a bright yellow, with the regular instruments shown as a smaller width.
I don't think there's a need to include the 1973 "lineup" as Yule calls that aborted tour "a mistake" and the promoter used the VU name despite being told not to. Ixat totep ( talk) 01:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
plz see the Apple plus movie Elger lorenzsonn ( talk) 15:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
1. Doug Yule plays drums on Loaded. On "Sweet Jane" (to cite just one example) he plays all instruments except rhythm guitar. So drums 1970 should be added to his credits.
2. Nico is not a member. This is definitional. The first album is The Velvet Underground & Nico, indicating they are separate artists collaborating. Live shows should have been promoted as such, but even if some weren't the album speaks to membership quite plainly: "Nico" is distinct from "The Velvet Underground" and Nico should accordingly be removed from the members section. If she were a member rather than a distinct artist working as a collaborator, the album would just be called The Velvet Underground. The group's induction into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame also reflects as much (I understand the Hall doesn't determine official band membership; I'm just marshalling evidence). The omission of Doug Yule suggests The Velvet Underground & Nico is the cornerstone reason for the group's induction. So why not include Nico? Because she was not a member. 2603:7000:3400:29E1:F4D3:E70A:5AA:ADE8 ( talk) 14:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Faulty sentence construction.
Suggest change:
"MacLise was replaced by Moe Tucker in 1965, who played on most of the band's recordings."
To:
"In 1965 MacLise was replaced by Moe Tucker, who played on most of the band's recordings. 2A00:23C8:7B09:FA01:ECF0:2E16:36C5:3807 ( talk) 01:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Paul Morrissey became the manager of the Velvet Underground and was the one who first brought them to the Factory after being introduced to the band by Barbara Rubin and Gerard Malanga at the Café Bizarre in late 1965. Morrissey was the one who suggested that Nico become part of the band and helped to get them their record deal with Verve. Warhol "produced" the Velvet Underground in the sense that he paid for their equipment and put money into promotion, but Morrissey actually handled all the bookings, money, etc. Morrissey, Warhol and Reed formed a company together called Warvel, Inc. that was dissolved in late 1967 after Reed temporarily broke up the band after firing Cale.
Additionally, Morrissey co-conceived and named the Exploding Plastic Inevitable creating all the early publicity and advertising material surrounding the traveling multimedia show.
He also took numerous photos of the band, including the one on the famed February 1966 "Uptight" flyer and the color portrait shots of the band on the back cover of the debut LP.
There are numerous sources to back all of this up, starting with "Up-tight: The Velvet Underground Story" by Victor Bockris and Gerard Malanga (1983). XmchaikenX ( talk) 22:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
I'm really just trying to find a citation near the beginning of this article where there is some discussion about the naming of the band/project. In the passage it says something like: The band was named after this book by the same name, "The Velvet Underground." I'd simply like to more about that historical conversation in general. Thanks Trogsloth99 ( talk) 11:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)