![]() | The Teen Idles has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Who is 'Azerrad', and where is the ISBN number for his/her book? (It should be in "References"). -- andreasegde 19:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of October 22, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
Overall the article is not bad. But it could use some sprucing up.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far. — Esprit15d 14:00, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
This is a well-written and serious article on what appears to be a fairly obscure band. Nice job on tracking down the information and arranging it so well! However, I think a few additions and source-checks will make it even better:
I think with a few minor fixes, this will easily pass GA. Awadewit | talk 00:28, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Noticed this article when the FA nom was posted at WP:PUNK. Just thought I'd chime in. Overall this looks good, but I note a couple of glaring omissions:
In general, I note that there hasn't been a heckuva lot of work done on this article since it passed GA about a year ago (only about 35 edits have been made since then, mostly minor). I highly recommend taking this through a couple more steps before nominating it for FA, as its chances of passing aren't that great:
Anyway, that's my two cents. Often we as editors are tempted to jump straight from GA to FA, thinking it won't be all that difficult, when in fact the difference between a GA article and an FA one is pretty dramatic, and getting there requires several intermediate steps. Requesting some help in the form of peer reviews and copyedits should get you there, though. You also might consider asking some help from WP:PUNK, which has recently undergone a major revitalization. -- IllaZilla ( talk) 01:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on The Teen Idles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | The Teen Idles has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Who is 'Azerrad', and where is the ISBN number for his/her book? (It should be in "References"). -- andreasegde 19:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of October 22, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
Overall the article is not bad. But it could use some sprucing up.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far. — Esprit15d 14:00, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
This is a well-written and serious article on what appears to be a fairly obscure band. Nice job on tracking down the information and arranging it so well! However, I think a few additions and source-checks will make it even better:
I think with a few minor fixes, this will easily pass GA. Awadewit | talk 00:28, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Noticed this article when the FA nom was posted at WP:PUNK. Just thought I'd chime in. Overall this looks good, but I note a couple of glaring omissions:
In general, I note that there hasn't been a heckuva lot of work done on this article since it passed GA about a year ago (only about 35 edits have been made since then, mostly minor). I highly recommend taking this through a couple more steps before nominating it for FA, as its chances of passing aren't that great:
Anyway, that's my two cents. Often we as editors are tempted to jump straight from GA to FA, thinking it won't be all that difficult, when in fact the difference between a GA article and an FA one is pretty dramatic, and getting there requires several intermediate steps. Requesting some help in the form of peer reviews and copyedits should get you there, though. You also might consider asking some help from WP:PUNK, which has recently undergone a major revitalization. -- IllaZilla ( talk) 01:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on The Teen Idles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)