This article was nominated for deletion on 27 May 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Still waiting for a real tracklist.
- unknown
Sign your posts, man.
Given that Burning Bridges, Breaking Hearts was reworked for the credits of Miroir Noir, I'd say there's a good chance that it's our third track.
That and Lenin from
Dark Was the Night were the last two remaining songs from the
Funeral era.
Maybe we'll also see a No Cars Go-esque reworking of another EP song.
- Rikkyc ( talk) 13:08, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
So we know two more now ("We Used to Wait" and "Ready to Start"):
http://www.weallwantsomeone.org/2010/06/14/new-arcade-fire-we-used-to-wait/
http://blogs.1077theend.com/aharms/2010/06/14/stream-1st-official-arcade-fire-single-ready-to-start/
Jwp2222 (
talk)
20:54, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
The arcade fire website says on the postcard that month of may is going to be on the album. fix this... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.129.51.72 ( talk) 00:38, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
From http://informationtypes.blogspot.com/2010/05/arcade-fire-suburbs-song-track-list-new.html and many other sources comes a tracklist. I don't know the legitimacy, but they all sound like Arcade Fire track titles if that helps. On the other hand, there are two new Arcade Fire songs, which haven't been confirmed to be on the album, but aren't on this tracklist.
1. Saturday Morning - 4:08
2. Month Of May - 3:40
3. Latchkey Kids - 3:38
4. The Suburbs - 5:24
5. Sandbox/Turf War - 6:32
6. In Iowa - 2:56
7. La Maison Dieu - 4:27
8. Tin Whistle - 3:08
9. Parson Green - 6:38
10. Asleep On The Beach - 2:45
11. Where We Fell In - 4:56
12. Never Stopped Running - 5:12 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.90.147 ( talk) 19:55, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
I've restored the "album ratings" template to the reception section. Wikipedia:ALBUM#Reception is clear that "the text may be supplemented with the {{Album ratings}} template, as a summary of professional reviews in table form". Indeed, all the featured articles and good articles ( Thriller (album), The Division Bell, Enta da Stage) I've checked have either this template, or the same information in the main infobox. It clearly should be kept here.-- Cúchullain t/ c 12:29, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
At the time of promotion, Thriller and Enta da Stage did indeed have reviews in the infobox, because it was a requirement at that time. Thriller was promoted to FA in September 2008 and Enta da Stage was promoted to FA in July 2006, whereas having reviews in the infobox was changed in December 2009 (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 33#Reviews in infobox: scrap?). Given that the ratings template has only existed since November 2009, it was clearly added long after both those albums were promoted and, as neither have been reviewed since, it is difficult to say whether they would have been or would not have been promoted at FAC. As for Division Bell, I have no idea why the reviewer promoted it to GA with reviews in the infobox, it was something that was picked up on during the GAR but then subsequently ignored by the reviewer. That was a mistake in my opinion. -- JD554 ( talk) 13:46, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
The review template is completely optional. It is certainly not a requirement--note the words "may be" in Wikipedia:ALBUM#Reception. Personally I don't use it because I prefer to focus on critical reception in the prose. This article already does that. WesleyDodds ( talk) 22:40, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Ishwasafish click here!!!
04:01, 5 August 2010 (UTC)Since there were two reviews, one ( Adam Downer) being and the other ( Tyler Fisher) being , on Sputnikmusic. I put it in the album ratings template as being , which is the average of the two, but this has just been changed, and I thought I should bring up the "issue" on the talk page. So, should one review be picked to be included in the template, should we use the average of the two, or should we exclude Sputnikmusic reviews from the ratings template entirely? I would prefer the second or third option.
Ishwasafish click here!!!
00:11, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
The article says 'although, as with most recent CD and digital releases, there is some compression applied.' AFAIK, CD is not compressed in the same way as a MP3 or other digital format, therefore I am unclear on the 'compression' that is applied to the CD format ? Jaruzel ( talk) 10:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
This is a different kind of compression. A good understanding may be gained by reading Dynamic range compression, specifically #Music_production and then comparing that to MP3. The topic hinted at in the article may be found in the article Loudness war. Whatever you think of this alleged 'war', it is clear that The Suburbs is a victim of compression. I have digital copies of both the vinyl edition and the CD edition, and the CD edition clearly has been amplified and chopped. Josejuan05 ( talk) 18:27, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
(cur | prev) 20:49, 3 April 2012 Malcolmxl5 (talk | contribs) m . . (15,399 bytes) (0) . . (Malcolmxl5 moved page Talk:The Suburbs (Arcade Fire album) to Talk:The Suburbs (album): unnecessary disambiguation) (undo | thank)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Suburbs (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:04, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: pages moved. Andrewa ( talk) 22:57, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
The Suburbs (album) → The Suburbs – I think this is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the term "The Suburbs" and I was surprised to see that it currently isn't, instead going to a band of the same name. I'd also support making The Suburbs a disambig page, if there's no clear consensus to move this. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 19:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 May 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Still waiting for a real tracklist.
- unknown
Sign your posts, man.
Given that Burning Bridges, Breaking Hearts was reworked for the credits of Miroir Noir, I'd say there's a good chance that it's our third track.
That and Lenin from
Dark Was the Night were the last two remaining songs from the
Funeral era.
Maybe we'll also see a No Cars Go-esque reworking of another EP song.
- Rikkyc ( talk) 13:08, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
So we know two more now ("We Used to Wait" and "Ready to Start"):
http://www.weallwantsomeone.org/2010/06/14/new-arcade-fire-we-used-to-wait/
http://blogs.1077theend.com/aharms/2010/06/14/stream-1st-official-arcade-fire-single-ready-to-start/
Jwp2222 (
talk)
20:54, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
The arcade fire website says on the postcard that month of may is going to be on the album. fix this... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.129.51.72 ( talk) 00:38, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
From http://informationtypes.blogspot.com/2010/05/arcade-fire-suburbs-song-track-list-new.html and many other sources comes a tracklist. I don't know the legitimacy, but they all sound like Arcade Fire track titles if that helps. On the other hand, there are two new Arcade Fire songs, which haven't been confirmed to be on the album, but aren't on this tracklist.
1. Saturday Morning - 4:08
2. Month Of May - 3:40
3. Latchkey Kids - 3:38
4. The Suburbs - 5:24
5. Sandbox/Turf War - 6:32
6. In Iowa - 2:56
7. La Maison Dieu - 4:27
8. Tin Whistle - 3:08
9. Parson Green - 6:38
10. Asleep On The Beach - 2:45
11. Where We Fell In - 4:56
12. Never Stopped Running - 5:12 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.90.147 ( talk) 19:55, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
I've restored the "album ratings" template to the reception section. Wikipedia:ALBUM#Reception is clear that "the text may be supplemented with the {{Album ratings}} template, as a summary of professional reviews in table form". Indeed, all the featured articles and good articles ( Thriller (album), The Division Bell, Enta da Stage) I've checked have either this template, or the same information in the main infobox. It clearly should be kept here.-- Cúchullain t/ c 12:29, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
At the time of promotion, Thriller and Enta da Stage did indeed have reviews in the infobox, because it was a requirement at that time. Thriller was promoted to FA in September 2008 and Enta da Stage was promoted to FA in July 2006, whereas having reviews in the infobox was changed in December 2009 (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 33#Reviews in infobox: scrap?). Given that the ratings template has only existed since November 2009, it was clearly added long after both those albums were promoted and, as neither have been reviewed since, it is difficult to say whether they would have been or would not have been promoted at FAC. As for Division Bell, I have no idea why the reviewer promoted it to GA with reviews in the infobox, it was something that was picked up on during the GAR but then subsequently ignored by the reviewer. That was a mistake in my opinion. -- JD554 ( talk) 13:46, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
The review template is completely optional. It is certainly not a requirement--note the words "may be" in Wikipedia:ALBUM#Reception. Personally I don't use it because I prefer to focus on critical reception in the prose. This article already does that. WesleyDodds ( talk) 22:40, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Ishwasafish click here!!!
04:01, 5 August 2010 (UTC)Since there were two reviews, one ( Adam Downer) being and the other ( Tyler Fisher) being , on Sputnikmusic. I put it in the album ratings template as being , which is the average of the two, but this has just been changed, and I thought I should bring up the "issue" on the talk page. So, should one review be picked to be included in the template, should we use the average of the two, or should we exclude Sputnikmusic reviews from the ratings template entirely? I would prefer the second or third option.
Ishwasafish click here!!!
00:11, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
The article says 'although, as with most recent CD and digital releases, there is some compression applied.' AFAIK, CD is not compressed in the same way as a MP3 or other digital format, therefore I am unclear on the 'compression' that is applied to the CD format ? Jaruzel ( talk) 10:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
This is a different kind of compression. A good understanding may be gained by reading Dynamic range compression, specifically #Music_production and then comparing that to MP3. The topic hinted at in the article may be found in the article Loudness war. Whatever you think of this alleged 'war', it is clear that The Suburbs is a victim of compression. I have digital copies of both the vinyl edition and the CD edition, and the CD edition clearly has been amplified and chopped. Josejuan05 ( talk) 18:27, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
(cur | prev) 20:49, 3 April 2012 Malcolmxl5 (talk | contribs) m . . (15,399 bytes) (0) . . (Malcolmxl5 moved page Talk:The Suburbs (Arcade Fire album) to Talk:The Suburbs (album): unnecessary disambiguation) (undo | thank)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Suburbs (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:04, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: pages moved. Andrewa ( talk) 22:57, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
The Suburbs (album) → The Suburbs – I think this is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the term "The Suburbs" and I was surprised to see that it currently isn't, instead going to a band of the same name. I'd also support making The Suburbs a disambig page, if there's no clear consensus to move this. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 19:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)