This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles Christianity: Texts / Catholicism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Religious texts (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Mid-importance).

I am troubled by the liberal addition of long quotes from the book here. It is not encyclopedic to create a WP:QUOTEFARM and borders on copyright infringement. It is quite preferable to paraphrase, in your own words, the thoughts you wish to express that are backed up by the WP:PRIMARY source. It is even more preferable to use reliable secondary sources for analysis of the text. Elizium23 ( talk) 17:16, 15 March 2020 (UTC) reply