![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
I'm curious to know if anyone actually has any evidence of Blumrich being a former NASA employee. The only information I can find out about him online relates to this book. (Weebull) 87.102.20.17 ( talk) 18:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
It is well-documented. NASA has a Technical Reports Server with a number of his articles and he obtained a number of U.S. patents that list him as being with NASA. Also, if you search newspapers (Highbeam.com, NewspaperArchive.com, News.Google.com) you will find many articles saying he was a NASA employee. 68.88.81.17 ( talk) 15:59, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
I removed a couple of references to Spaceships Of Ezekiel being a novel; it isn't, but I'm not certain what else it can be called. Non-fiction? Analysis? Theological study? Anyway, the main question is how to change the thing about it being a "novel stub", which of course it isn't. Should the stub tag be removed, or changed to something else? -- Torak 22:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
This in no way rises even to the level of hypothesis, much less theory. Since we are talking about a NASA scientist, it's important we use accurate words in order not to mislead readers in thinking this idea rises to the level of a scientific theory, like gravity or germ theory. Auntie E. 02:09, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
I've just removed a reference [1] which was claimed to be an "on-line transcription from photocopy of article provided by NASA under FOIA request" whereas it's just a UP article on Spaceshipsofezekial.com. I note that he is not called Chief of NASA's Systems Layout Branch but "chief of the systems layout branch of the program development office at the Marshall Space Flight Center", something significantly different (and less grand). Dougweller ( talk) 07:21, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Here's some NASA articles by Blumrich from the NASA website: [2] Lung salad ( talk) 18:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
The Vision of Ezekiel is nothing extraordinary, the animals representing Spring, Summer, Autumn and Winter, inspired from Babylonian Astrology, that became transposed onto a Messianic Ideal and the Book of Ezekiel contains the lay-out prototype plan for a new Temple of Jerusalem following the Jews' liberation from Babylonian captivity by Cyrus The Great. This was when Messianic Speculation began and Apocalyptic literature took off Lung salad ( talk) 18:18, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Lung salad ( talk) 08:32, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
In the introdution it says; "The Spaceships of Ezekiel (1974) is a book by Josef F. Blumrich (March 17, 1913 – February 10, 2002)". However, given that it does not mention who he is, I therefore added that he was a NASA engineer, changing the sentence to reading; "The Spaceships of Ezekiel (1974) is a book by MASA engineer Josef F. Blumrich (March 17, 1913 – February 10, 2002)", however that was reverted? - Okama-San ( talk) 13:34, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Ah, I see that now. Strange how I did not se that sentence before. Is it recently added? Anyway, great, then I am satisfied.:) - Okama-San ( talk) 18:22, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
I'm curious to know if anyone actually has any evidence of Blumrich being a former NASA employee. The only information I can find out about him online relates to this book. (Weebull) 87.102.20.17 ( talk) 18:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
It is well-documented. NASA has a Technical Reports Server with a number of his articles and he obtained a number of U.S. patents that list him as being with NASA. Also, if you search newspapers (Highbeam.com, NewspaperArchive.com, News.Google.com) you will find many articles saying he was a NASA employee. 68.88.81.17 ( talk) 15:59, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
I removed a couple of references to Spaceships Of Ezekiel being a novel; it isn't, but I'm not certain what else it can be called. Non-fiction? Analysis? Theological study? Anyway, the main question is how to change the thing about it being a "novel stub", which of course it isn't. Should the stub tag be removed, or changed to something else? -- Torak 22:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
This in no way rises even to the level of hypothesis, much less theory. Since we are talking about a NASA scientist, it's important we use accurate words in order not to mislead readers in thinking this idea rises to the level of a scientific theory, like gravity or germ theory. Auntie E. 02:09, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
I've just removed a reference [1] which was claimed to be an "on-line transcription from photocopy of article provided by NASA under FOIA request" whereas it's just a UP article on Spaceshipsofezekial.com. I note that he is not called Chief of NASA's Systems Layout Branch but "chief of the systems layout branch of the program development office at the Marshall Space Flight Center", something significantly different (and less grand). Dougweller ( talk) 07:21, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Here's some NASA articles by Blumrich from the NASA website: [2] Lung salad ( talk) 18:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
The Vision of Ezekiel is nothing extraordinary, the animals representing Spring, Summer, Autumn and Winter, inspired from Babylonian Astrology, that became transposed onto a Messianic Ideal and the Book of Ezekiel contains the lay-out prototype plan for a new Temple of Jerusalem following the Jews' liberation from Babylonian captivity by Cyrus The Great. This was when Messianic Speculation began and Apocalyptic literature took off Lung salad ( talk) 18:18, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Lung salad ( talk) 08:32, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
In the introdution it says; "The Spaceships of Ezekiel (1974) is a book by Josef F. Blumrich (March 17, 1913 – February 10, 2002)". However, given that it does not mention who he is, I therefore added that he was a NASA engineer, changing the sentence to reading; "The Spaceships of Ezekiel (1974) is a book by MASA engineer Josef F. Blumrich (March 17, 1913 – February 10, 2002)", however that was reverted? - Okama-San ( talk) 13:34, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Ah, I see that now. Strange how I did not se that sentence before. Is it recently added? Anyway, great, then I am satisfied.:) - Okama-San ( talk) 18:22, 31 August 2018 (UTC)