![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Can we find some specific critical responses? Personally, I thought the ending was rubbish. Slac speak up! 13:05, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
First off Mr. Davies is one of my favorite writers however I found the Gnostic tone of The second Coming very disturbing considering the present biblical illiteracy among the masses. All that being said I wonder , was Mr. davies formaly train in christian theology? —Preceding unsigned comment added by OleDeacon ( talk • contribs) 04:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
The child/abortion reference was omitted from the U.S. DVD release. Was it on the UK DVD release? MCB 05:32, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
I'm not sure "TV series" is a very accurate description for this production — it was a self-contained two-part drama, whereas 'series' suggests a number of episodes and a different kind of show. Oughtn't it to be moved back to the more general "TV"? Angmering 20:14, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Since GMc has not responded, I attempted to restore the page to the old name myself, but due to the convoluted nature of the previous moves I was unable to do so (it will require an admin to do it). I listed the page on WP:RM and put the move header at the top of this talk page. Hopefully this will be dealt with reasonably quickly. -- MCB 05:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Just a note that I've removed the black bars from the images. Nice article, all. WindsorFan 08:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
It seems a little ridiculous that this image is here, doesn't it? It's just a grey box with the words "The Second Coming" in the middle, in a pretty nondescript font. And when you first pull up the page, it's the only image you see. I don't see how it adds to the article whatsoever, and I'd much rather see one of the other screen shots there at the top of the page. Yes? AaronL 03:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
I just wonder about the relevance of placing in ( ) that Davies was head writer of Doctor Who? He is very well known for it, but it doesn't seem necessary here. Perhaps it can be referenced under the characters list next to Eccleston? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.69.141.108 ( talk) 23:20, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Can we find some specific critical responses? Personally, I thought the ending was rubbish. Slac speak up! 13:05, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
First off Mr. Davies is one of my favorite writers however I found the Gnostic tone of The second Coming very disturbing considering the present biblical illiteracy among the masses. All that being said I wonder , was Mr. davies formaly train in christian theology? —Preceding unsigned comment added by OleDeacon ( talk • contribs) 04:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
The child/abortion reference was omitted from the U.S. DVD release. Was it on the UK DVD release? MCB 05:32, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
I'm not sure "TV series" is a very accurate description for this production — it was a self-contained two-part drama, whereas 'series' suggests a number of episodes and a different kind of show. Oughtn't it to be moved back to the more general "TV"? Angmering 20:14, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Since GMc has not responded, I attempted to restore the page to the old name myself, but due to the convoluted nature of the previous moves I was unable to do so (it will require an admin to do it). I listed the page on WP:RM and put the move header at the top of this talk page. Hopefully this will be dealt with reasonably quickly. -- MCB 05:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Just a note that I've removed the black bars from the images. Nice article, all. WindsorFan 08:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
It seems a little ridiculous that this image is here, doesn't it? It's just a grey box with the words "The Second Coming" in the middle, in a pretty nondescript font. And when you first pull up the page, it's the only image you see. I don't see how it adds to the article whatsoever, and I'd much rather see one of the other screen shots there at the top of the page. Yes? AaronL 03:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
I just wonder about the relevance of placing in ( ) that Davies was head writer of Doctor Who? He is very well known for it, but it doesn't seem necessary here. Perhaps it can be referenced under the characters list next to Eccleston? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.69.141.108 ( talk) 23:20, 1 November 2011 (UTC)