![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of The Royals was copied or moved into List of The Royals episodes with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
For some reason I have been led to believe that this will air from 26 Feb. 2018 - does anyone know on which channel? Thanks.
I understand the distinction between Queen/King of the UK and King/Queen of England, and as far as the general text of the article we should certainly stick to how the sources describe the setting of the series. But I'm not so sure about designating the direct quote by Hurley as flawed (using sic). Queen Elizabeth is the Queen of England, Ireland and Scotland so referring to Diana/Harry as potential Queen/King of England is correct, just not complete. Putting aside my guess that "Queen of England" is a common encapsulating expression and Hurley herself as a Brit would know the difference, we can point out spelling mistakes to show that WP editors have not made them, but as far as I'm concerned we're not meant to point out factual errors like this in quotations. If Hurley was making an inaccurate claim (like "William will directly succeed Elizabeth") then we might attribute the quote like, "According to Hurley ..." but this is really just lingo. — TAnthony Talk 18:50, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
""Princess Diana", "King/Queen of England": these are non-existent titles" - err, wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.159.28 ( talk) 15:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
I've removed the comment from People magazine in the "Reception" section about the Emmy Award.
This was a comment about one line in one episode and not a review of the TV series. The out-of-context presentation and wording of the quote as placed in the "Reception" section is deceptive and seems to be intended to create the perception of a positive review where none existed. BlueSalix ( talk) 17:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
The reviews are all negative and are presumably from an American perspective. However as a British subject I can attest that this show is absolutely fabulous and a breath of fresh air from otherwise formulaic and tedious offerings. The casting is superb and the irony clearly lost on Americans. The storyline is riveting and sooooo naughty. Clearly made for a British audience that would appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.167.3 ( talk) 17:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
In this show, there is a specific declaration on His/Her Royal Highness/Majesty. You call it clutter, its something very specific to this show. In The Tudors, The Crown, Victoria and even Reign, there is a lack of issue with titles (even incorrect uses actually). I believe specifically the reason in the Royals they do it because of the station standings of Jasper. Mainly seen with Beck but it has also ruffled Robert's feathers in S3. Theoretically, with the elevation of Robert and death of a Simon, even in a fictional environment Eleanor and Liam would have had their formal titles changed from "HRH The" to "HRH" as it is isolated to when the sovereign parent is King/Queen. Helena is Queen Consort as she is not Queen in her own right. She did try that power play in S2, to make her the last monarch when Cyrus died but that did not pass. While Cyrus has called her Queen Mother, it remains to be seen completely if Robert elects to demote her station to Queen Dowager. Although regardless unless stripped, she would still have all the comforts befitting a sitting Queen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MCharmed21 ( talk • contribs) 16:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Royals (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:10, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Where can i find all the music of The Royals T.V show? 147.194.85.199 ( talk) 02:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of The Royals was copied or moved into List of The Royals episodes with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
For some reason I have been led to believe that this will air from 26 Feb. 2018 - does anyone know on which channel? Thanks.
I understand the distinction between Queen/King of the UK and King/Queen of England, and as far as the general text of the article we should certainly stick to how the sources describe the setting of the series. But I'm not so sure about designating the direct quote by Hurley as flawed (using sic). Queen Elizabeth is the Queen of England, Ireland and Scotland so referring to Diana/Harry as potential Queen/King of England is correct, just not complete. Putting aside my guess that "Queen of England" is a common encapsulating expression and Hurley herself as a Brit would know the difference, we can point out spelling mistakes to show that WP editors have not made them, but as far as I'm concerned we're not meant to point out factual errors like this in quotations. If Hurley was making an inaccurate claim (like "William will directly succeed Elizabeth") then we might attribute the quote like, "According to Hurley ..." but this is really just lingo. — TAnthony Talk 18:50, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
""Princess Diana", "King/Queen of England": these are non-existent titles" - err, wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.159.28 ( talk) 15:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
I've removed the comment from People magazine in the "Reception" section about the Emmy Award.
This was a comment about one line in one episode and not a review of the TV series. The out-of-context presentation and wording of the quote as placed in the "Reception" section is deceptive and seems to be intended to create the perception of a positive review where none existed. BlueSalix ( talk) 17:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
The reviews are all negative and are presumably from an American perspective. However as a British subject I can attest that this show is absolutely fabulous and a breath of fresh air from otherwise formulaic and tedious offerings. The casting is superb and the irony clearly lost on Americans. The storyline is riveting and sooooo naughty. Clearly made for a British audience that would appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.167.3 ( talk) 17:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
In this show, there is a specific declaration on His/Her Royal Highness/Majesty. You call it clutter, its something very specific to this show. In The Tudors, The Crown, Victoria and even Reign, there is a lack of issue with titles (even incorrect uses actually). I believe specifically the reason in the Royals they do it because of the station standings of Jasper. Mainly seen with Beck but it has also ruffled Robert's feathers in S3. Theoretically, with the elevation of Robert and death of a Simon, even in a fictional environment Eleanor and Liam would have had their formal titles changed from "HRH The" to "HRH" as it is isolated to when the sovereign parent is King/Queen. Helena is Queen Consort as she is not Queen in her own right. She did try that power play in S2, to make her the last monarch when Cyrus died but that did not pass. While Cyrus has called her Queen Mother, it remains to be seen completely if Robert elects to demote her station to Queen Dowager. Although regardless unless stripped, she would still have all the comforts befitting a sitting Queen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MCharmed21 ( talk • contribs) 16:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Royals (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:10, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Where can i find all the music of The Royals T.V show? 147.194.85.199 ( talk) 02:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)