This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
I am quite disturbed by what I found here. If you have some valid criticism, cite it, but the wikipedia is not to have an editorial bias, especially not to the exclusion of needed info. [[User:Sam Spade| Sam Spade Arb Com election]] 12:18, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
I'm going to be removing the header soon, unless someone objects. [[User:Sam Spade| Sam Spade Arb Com election]] 20:53, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on The Road to Serfdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
The first sentence of this section is editorializing and non-verifiable (i.e. whether Hayek is "clear" when read in full. Clear to whom?). I think it should be deleted.
Aside from the unnecessary part about when Hayek lived, the rest of the paragraph is non-verifiable (i.e. that the work is timeless) or editorializing (i.e. that readers need to read history first). I recommend the entire paragraph be deleted.
Overall the section reads like an apology for Hayek. The cited items seem relevant but I wonder if they could be included in a separate section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.120.140.241 ( talk) 05:44, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Hayek discusses Johann Plenge but has not been mentioned in the summary? Leutha ( talk) 15:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
I am quite disturbed by what I found here. If you have some valid criticism, cite it, but the wikipedia is not to have an editorial bias, especially not to the exclusion of needed info. [[User:Sam Spade| Sam Spade Arb Com election]] 12:18, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
I'm going to be removing the header soon, unless someone objects. [[User:Sam Spade| Sam Spade Arb Com election]] 20:53, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on The Road to Serfdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
The first sentence of this section is editorializing and non-verifiable (i.e. whether Hayek is "clear" when read in full. Clear to whom?). I think it should be deleted.
Aside from the unnecessary part about when Hayek lived, the rest of the paragraph is non-verifiable (i.e. that the work is timeless) or editorializing (i.e. that readers need to read history first). I recommend the entire paragraph be deleted.
Overall the section reads like an apology for Hayek. The cited items seem relevant but I wonder if they could be included in a separate section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.120.140.241 ( talk) 05:44, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Hayek discusses Johann Plenge but has not been mentioned in the summary? Leutha ( talk) 15:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC)