Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
The passing review has been declared invalid so I will conduct a reassessment to see if it meets the good article criteria.
AIRcorn
(talk)
13:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Many thanks for taking the time to do the reassessment. To address the problem areas:
Re: 2: Perhaps "was reviewed extensively on both sides of the Atlantic"?
Re: 3: You are right, the synopsis is 1,200 words but WP:MoS indicates 900 as usually being sufficient. I'll have a go at paring back the material and summarizing appropriately those points gone into in what might be excessive detail.
Re: 6: a) Perhaps the American cover can be put in the release details section (but this is hardly critical and perhaps the best solution would be to delete it from the article) b) I'll have a go at rewriting the captions you flag.
I should be able to get round to doing the above in the next 24 hours. Regards, Jprw ( talk) 06:17, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
The passing review has been declared invalid so I will conduct a reassessment to see if it meets the good article criteria.
AIRcorn
(talk)
13:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Many thanks for taking the time to do the reassessment. To address the problem areas:
Re: 2: Perhaps "was reviewed extensively on both sides of the Atlantic"?
Re: 3: You are right, the synopsis is 1,200 words but WP:MoS indicates 900 as usually being sufficient. I'll have a go at paring back the material and summarizing appropriately those points gone into in what might be excessive detail.
Re: 6: a) Perhaps the American cover can be put in the release details section (but this is hardly critical and perhaps the best solution would be to delete it from the article) b) I'll have a go at rewriting the captions you flag.
I should be able to get round to doing the above in the next 24 hours. Regards, Jprw ( talk) 06:17, 7 March 2012 (UTC)