This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I deleted the section that just plagerized the NYT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.151.16.20 ( talk) 21:16, 19 May 2014 (UTC) reply

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... stub article, not yet finished. -- Shentino ( talk) 18:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC) reply

• CBS? But the link says CNBC...! -- 168.156.251.65 ( talk) 19:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The column titled "Original Offer" isn't exactly correct. For example, in the Farmgirl Flowers episode the original offer was 25% for $1M, not 20%. 20% was the final offer. I suggest either the title of the columns change or the true original offers should be listed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.183.126.119 ( talk) 00:54, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Starting on season 3: 1) the table format/columns have changed 2) episode titles now have "quotes" 3) month names are in long format 4) width of the table is 75% For continuity - make a decision!! ESAD-Hooker ( talk) 04:52, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ ESAD-Hooker: The issues appears to be that seasons 1 and 2 were formatted as a generic Wikitable, while later seasons are formatted via the formal Episode list template. The template automates a lot of cells and parameters, and has stricter rules about the order parameters can go in. Arguably, seasons 1 and 2 should be rewritten using the template, but it would take a fair bit of time and effort to do. I've altered the width for S3 and S4 to 100% however. -- Whats new? ^(talk) 05:26, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ ESAD-Hooker: I like that the format is now unified, but you do realize that now we lost the "Follow-up in a Future Episode" information? I think they are important, so is there any way include that to the new table format? Kardistan ( talk) 18:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Do I at least get a "Right On" ESAD-Hooker ( talk) 18:34, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply