| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The One Where Ross and Rachel Take a Break redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Any objections? It's a two-parter and the A-stories are the most important part of the plots so they may as well be merged into " The One Where Ross and Rachel Take a Break / The One the Morning After". Brad 07:44, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
The shows ran as two separate shows and they should remain two separate wiki entries. If they were to be merged -- which I object with extreme prejudice unless these shows are running as a single entity in syndication and/or on official DVD releases -- then it must be detailed enough that those trying top settle bar bets without any doubt will know what happened on each part. There can be know question about which plot point/which scene/etc. occurred in which part. Wikiguin 07:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- I also oppose this suggestion for the simple reason that they are two separate and unique episodes - they first aired separately a week apart and within the standard timeslot for the show. If they had aired and been listed by good sources as a specific double episode then there is an arguement for a merger, but they are clearly defined through credits, airdates, etc. as being individual and separate episodes which are simply part of a larger story arc - two parter or no, the distinction should be clear. A two part episode and a double-length single episode are not the same thing. Tx17777 20:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- I also oppose. The two episodes are billed separately. They are not one of the Ones with Two Parts. Quite a number of Friends episodes continue the story directly. Timrollpickering 11:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The One Where Ross and Rachel Take a Break redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Any objections? It's a two-parter and the A-stories are the most important part of the plots so they may as well be merged into " The One Where Ross and Rachel Take a Break / The One the Morning After". Brad 07:44, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
The shows ran as two separate shows and they should remain two separate wiki entries. If they were to be merged -- which I object with extreme prejudice unless these shows are running as a single entity in syndication and/or on official DVD releases -- then it must be detailed enough that those trying top settle bar bets without any doubt will know what happened on each part. There can be know question about which plot point/which scene/etc. occurred in which part. Wikiguin 07:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- I also oppose this suggestion for the simple reason that they are two separate and unique episodes - they first aired separately a week apart and within the standard timeslot for the show. If they had aired and been listed by good sources as a specific double episode then there is an arguement for a merger, but they are clearly defined through credits, airdates, etc. as being individual and separate episodes which are simply part of a larger story arc - two parter or no, the distinction should be clear. A two part episode and a double-length single episode are not the same thing. Tx17777 20:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- I also oppose. The two episodes are billed separately. They are not one of the Ones with Two Parts. Quite a number of Friends episodes continue the story directly. Timrollpickering 11:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)