This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to
Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Hi. Somebody added pro-government to the first sentence. I tend to read the newspaper just about every day and i don't really feel it's pro-government but i thought i would see what other people thought. I feel on the whole, its middle of the line in terms of criticism and support. Thoughts? Cheers --
PatrickFlaherty (
talk)
20:18, 6 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Page has some serious bias. AJR, The New Republic, and other sources all have credibility issues of their own, yet are cited as credible critics of The National. That borders on farcical. The page also ignores some of their award-winning coverage. Someone has a clear bias here.
96.31.177.52 (
talk)
00:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to
Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Hi. Somebody added pro-government to the first sentence. I tend to read the newspaper just about every day and i don't really feel it's pro-government but i thought i would see what other people thought. I feel on the whole, its middle of the line in terms of criticism and support. Thoughts? Cheers --
PatrickFlaherty (
talk)
20:18, 6 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Page has some serious bias. AJR, The New Republic, and other sources all have credibility issues of their own, yet are cited as credible critics of The National. That borders on farcical. The page also ignores some of their award-winning coverage. Someone has a clear bias here.
96.31.177.52 (
talk)
00:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)reply