Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: NinjaRobotPirate ( talk · contribs) 15:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC) reply

This will be my second GA review. Prior to the review, I will make a few copy edits to the article in order to correct easy fixable errors. I don't foresee any major problems. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 15:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC) reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is " clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Citations in the lead seem unnecessary, per WP:LEADCITE, but it's alright to include them. I performed a few copy edits on the article clear up a few minor issues.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citations to reliable sources:

   I replaced an iffy citation

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   No issues remain; article passes