![]() | The Math Myth has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 28, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from The Math Myth appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 9 December 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
AirshipJungleman29
talk 17:07, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Created by Generalissima ( talk). Self-nominated at 08:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Math Myth; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sohom Datta ( talk · contribs)
comparing the ensuing politicization of math education to Sputnik.It might be great to be explicit about exactly what about Sputnik is being compared to here.
of the contemporary American education system
The coaching industry, mainly tutoring students in pursuit of mathematics and standardized testing, is heavily decried.of standardized tests in mathematics ?
coachingmight not be a universally understood term
with Hacker claims that while girls ...with Hacker claiming
Gender gaps in math education is analyzedare analyzed
Hacker argues that the intense focus on math as a metric for student success leads to negative consequences in tertiary education and college access for students who are not proficient in advanced mathematics, even when the majority of students go into fields where such knowledge is unnecessary.This is a huge sentence, and is a bit hard to cross-reference and parse :)
Academic coverage of The Math Myth was generally more positive than in mainstream press.Can we add some context as to why (no need to implement this if there are no sources for it)
![]() | The Math Myth has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 28, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from The Math Myth appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 9 December 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
AirshipJungleman29
talk 17:07, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Created by Generalissima ( talk). Self-nominated at 08:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Math Myth; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sohom Datta ( talk · contribs)
comparing the ensuing politicization of math education to Sputnik.It might be great to be explicit about exactly what about Sputnik is being compared to here.
of the contemporary American education system
The coaching industry, mainly tutoring students in pursuit of mathematics and standardized testing, is heavily decried.of standardized tests in mathematics ?
coachingmight not be a universally understood term
with Hacker claims that while girls ...with Hacker claiming
Gender gaps in math education is analyzedare analyzed
Hacker argues that the intense focus on math as a metric for student success leads to negative consequences in tertiary education and college access for students who are not proficient in advanced mathematics, even when the majority of students go into fields where such knowledge is unnecessary.This is a huge sentence, and is a bit hard to cross-reference and parse :)
Academic coverage of The Math Myth was generally more positive than in mainstream press.Can we add some context as to why (no need to implement this if there are no sources for it)