Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 ( talk · contribs) 01:53, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b ( MoS):

   • It may help to reorder the plot to describe Homer having the party in International Waters then move on to describe Mr. Burns at the Mayo Clinic so the reader does not have to jump back in forth in reading what Homer is doing.

   • I don't think that would work, since the two plots are connected at the end. I think it's better the way it is now. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Is it possible to find a screenshot from this episode?

   • I can't think of any that would pass WP:NFCC, so no. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for a few concerns to be addressed. Dough 48 72 01:53, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the review! :) Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply

I will now pass the article. Dough 48 72 01:20, 17 November 2011 (UTC) reply