This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can
the article attached to this page, help out with the
open tasks, or contribute to the
discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
I have never seen this episode, but I have seen a TNG episode, in which Q tries to sentence Jean-luc for all of humanity's crimes. This seems shockingly familiar.
I'm having a little trouble following the plot. Are Kirk and his crew transported to 17th century America, or are they staying on Megas-Tu? And why would the Megans try Lucien? It's not clear to me, since presumably the Megans are fine with magic (whereas the Salem Witch Trials were not fine with magic).
"He returned home and started work on the script immediately, wanting to improve it far beyond the point that he had developed when he pitched it for The Original Series." -- make clear who you're talking about here (Brody presumably)
"Fontana was aware of the controversial content of the episode, and later said that some people felt that the episode dealt with the devil sympathetically, but believed that it was a good episode." -- could you rewrite this so that "episode" is not being used three times?
I'm having trouble following your summary of Hoffman's review. Why would he need to recite the dialogue in the episode? He also describes the episode as the "weirdest", which may be something worth including in the article.
The article includes just two reviews. I know it can be difficult to find reviews of such old episodes. but I found these (not sure if they're reliable or not):
[1][2]
That's it for now! I'll place the article on hold for the standard seven days. Please write here when responding, as I have this on my watchlist. Thanks! Ruby2010/201301:56, 22 March 2015 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can
the article attached to this page, help out with the
open tasks, or contribute to the
discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
I have never seen this episode, but I have seen a TNG episode, in which Q tries to sentence Jean-luc for all of humanity's crimes. This seems shockingly familiar.
I'm having a little trouble following the plot. Are Kirk and his crew transported to 17th century America, or are they staying on Megas-Tu? And why would the Megans try Lucien? It's not clear to me, since presumably the Megans are fine with magic (whereas the Salem Witch Trials were not fine with magic).
"He returned home and started work on the script immediately, wanting to improve it far beyond the point that he had developed when he pitched it for The Original Series." -- make clear who you're talking about here (Brody presumably)
"Fontana was aware of the controversial content of the episode, and later said that some people felt that the episode dealt with the devil sympathetically, but believed that it was a good episode." -- could you rewrite this so that "episode" is not being used three times?
I'm having trouble following your summary of Hoffman's review. Why would he need to recite the dialogue in the episode? He also describes the episode as the "weirdest", which may be something worth including in the article.
The article includes just two reviews. I know it can be difficult to find reviews of such old episodes. but I found these (not sure if they're reliable or not):
[1][2]
That's it for now! I'll place the article on hold for the standard seven days. Please write here when responding, as I have this on my watchlist. Thanks! Ruby2010/201301:56, 22 March 2015 (UTC)reply