GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wizardman ( talk · contribs) 02:24, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
I'll review this article shortly. Wizardman 02:24, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Here are the issues I found with the article:
In short, there's really not much to this article, and it does feel like a lot is missing when I read it. As it is, it's not ready for GA-status yet. I'm aware that some things (such as any casting decisions, reviews from back then) will not be easy to find, but the article will be much better if they are in there. As a result I have to fail this article as it stands. It can always be re-nominated after this is further expanded and sourced. Wizardman 02:37, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wizardman ( talk · contribs) 02:24, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
I'll review this article shortly. Wizardman 02:24, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Here are the issues I found with the article:
In short, there's really not much to this article, and it does feel like a lot is missing when I read it. As it is, it's not ready for GA-status yet. I'm aware that some things (such as any casting decisions, reviews from back then) will not be easy to find, but the article will be much better if they are in there. As a result I have to fail this article as it stands. It can always be re-nominated after this is further expanded and sourced. Wizardman 02:37, 24 April 2014 (UTC)