Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase ( talk · contribs) 15:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC) reply

I'll review this one. Zwerg Nase ( talk) 15:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC) reply

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a ( major aspects): b ( focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

A very solid article, just a few things to straighten out:

• Background: You write she was "countersued" by Hidden Beach. Why "counter", did she sue them first?
• Track list needs a source.
• Two dead links-

That's it, on hold for now. Good job! Zwerg Nase ( talk) 19:05, 26 October 2015 (UTC) reply

@ Zwerg Nase:, I have no idea why it was worded that way lol. I changed it to "sued", added a source for the track listing, and replaced the dead links. Dan56 ( talk) 03:43, 27 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Looks good, it's a pass :) Zwerg Nase ( talk) 09:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC) reply