GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Casliber ( talk · contribs) 09:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I am taking a look and making some straightforward copyedits as I go. I'll jot questions/issues below:
Cas Liber (
talk ·
contribs) 09:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
*In the opening scene, Herpich used unicorn symbolism, most notably the tapestry The Unicorn is in Captivity and No Longer Dead, a piece of the seven-part tapestry The Hunt of the Unicorn, to illustrate the themes of the episode - this sentence is hard to follow with all teh commas. I'd write it as, "In the opening scene, Herpich used unicorn symbolism, most notably the tapestry The Unicorn is in Captivity and No Longer Dead—a piece of the seven-part tapestry The Hunt of the Unicorn—to illustrate the themes of the episode"
:*Good point. Changed.--
Gen. Quon
(Talk) 18:32, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
3. Broad in coverage?:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
5. Reasonably stable?
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
Overall:
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Casliber ( talk · contribs) 09:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I am taking a look and making some straightforward copyedits as I go. I'll jot questions/issues below:
Cas Liber (
talk ·
contribs) 09:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
*In the opening scene, Herpich used unicorn symbolism, most notably the tapestry The Unicorn is in Captivity and No Longer Dead, a piece of the seven-part tapestry The Hunt of the Unicorn, to illustrate the themes of the episode - this sentence is hard to follow with all teh commas. I'd write it as, "In the opening scene, Herpich used unicorn symbolism, most notably the tapestry The Unicorn is in Captivity and No Longer Dead—a piece of the seven-part tapestry The Hunt of the Unicorn—to illustrate the themes of the episode"
:*Good point. Changed.--
Gen. Quon
(Talk) 18:32, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
3. Broad in coverage?:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
5. Reasonably stable?
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
Overall: