From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Split

  • Oppose Currently! - There is nothing as yet to split - needs more before this is justified. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/ (Desk) 11:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Agree - There is no reason to prevent the film from having its own article. Many films based on books are given their own articles. Why can't the same be done here? ( IndulgentReader ( talk) 00:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)) reply
  • Agree – the film is different from the novel and should have its own article. -- Law Lord ( talk) 09:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Agree – I absolutely agree! Is the concern that there is not enough content in the film portion of this article right now? If so, we can flesh it out nce it has its own home. KConWiki ( talk) 13:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Conclusion: Result of the discussion is Split. I will do this right away. -- Law Lord ( talk) 09:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Split

  • Oppose Currently! - There is nothing as yet to split - needs more before this is justified. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/ (Desk) 11:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Agree - There is no reason to prevent the film from having its own article. Many films based on books are given their own articles. Why can't the same be done here? ( IndulgentReader ( talk) 00:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)) reply
  • Agree – the film is different from the novel and should have its own article. -- Law Lord ( talk) 09:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Agree – I absolutely agree! Is the concern that there is not enough content in the film portion of this article right now? If so, we can flesh it out nce it has its own home. KConWiki ( talk) 13:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Conclusion: Result of the discussion is Split. I will do this right away. -- Law Lord ( talk) 09:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook