This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
According to this edit by an anonymous editor, the news about Peter S. Beagle's plans regarding his "three Schmendrick stories" and three unicorn stories were released in an issue of Beagle's newsletter. Can someone identify the issue and/or direct me to a link to an archive of it (couldn't find it on the newsletter's webpage archives) so that we can source it properly? Thanks. -- SilentAria talk 03:07, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
I have provided ";Citations" for the first ed and the 2007 Deluxe Ed and refashioned all inline references to the latter so that they succinctly link to its Citation (using [[#deluxe|Deluxe Edition]],
).
I have nearly copied the Deluxe ";Contents" from ISFDB into section Publications. Someone with the book in hand may improve the description and of course improve its use as a source.
For one, our use of the Deluxe Edition as a source should not simply give page numbers (Deluxe Edition, p247ff). Either the references or the text where they appear should specify the Introduction by Connor Cochran, Interview of Peter Beagle, text of Two Hearts, and corrected text of The Last Unicorn. -- P64 ( talk) 16:33, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
I believe something should be added about the Red Bull; at least that it is blind, and apparently somehow enthralled to King Haggard. To me it has always been both enigmatic and symbolic of some profoundly primordial force of nature, neither good nor evil. It was always destined, of course, to back down from any unicorn that simply stood up to it; thereby securing its own 'release from contract'. Of course what I'm saying is too subjectively interpretive for Wikipedia - but surely a few words about the Red Bull are called for. Subtendant ( talk) 04:05, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
How about this?
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on The Last Unicorn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I own an abridged paperback of this story. I feel the story is about the same as the movie with slight differences. I came here to look for differences to the hardcover edition, but neither the page length given for different editions nor "There have been many print editions of The Last Unicorn." Helps with that. I also find that original 1968 editions are prohibitively expensive attributed to "the beautiful illustrations" but i have never seen one and this article doesn't mention it. 176.11.75.177 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:16, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
According to this edit by an anonymous editor, the news about Peter S. Beagle's plans regarding his "three Schmendrick stories" and three unicorn stories were released in an issue of Beagle's newsletter. Can someone identify the issue and/or direct me to a link to an archive of it (couldn't find it on the newsletter's webpage archives) so that we can source it properly? Thanks. -- SilentAria talk 03:07, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
I have provided ";Citations" for the first ed and the 2007 Deluxe Ed and refashioned all inline references to the latter so that they succinctly link to its Citation (using [[#deluxe|Deluxe Edition]],
).
I have nearly copied the Deluxe ";Contents" from ISFDB into section Publications. Someone with the book in hand may improve the description and of course improve its use as a source.
For one, our use of the Deluxe Edition as a source should not simply give page numbers (Deluxe Edition, p247ff). Either the references or the text where they appear should specify the Introduction by Connor Cochran, Interview of Peter Beagle, text of Two Hearts, and corrected text of The Last Unicorn. -- P64 ( talk) 16:33, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
I believe something should be added about the Red Bull; at least that it is blind, and apparently somehow enthralled to King Haggard. To me it has always been both enigmatic and symbolic of some profoundly primordial force of nature, neither good nor evil. It was always destined, of course, to back down from any unicorn that simply stood up to it; thereby securing its own 'release from contract'. Of course what I'm saying is too subjectively interpretive for Wikipedia - but surely a few words about the Red Bull are called for. Subtendant ( talk) 04:05, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
How about this?
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on The Last Unicorn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I own an abridged paperback of this story. I feel the story is about the same as the movie with slight differences. I came here to look for differences to the hardcover edition, but neither the page length given for different editions nor "There have been many print editions of The Last Unicorn." Helps with that. I also find that original 1968 editions are prohibitively expensive attributed to "the beautiful illustrations" but i have never seen one and this article doesn't mention it. 176.11.75.177 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:16, 31 August 2019 (UTC)