![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
I'm looking to collaborate with people to create a neutral and informative section describing the racial controversy.
I've been following this controversy for a few months. It is prudent to give it its own section in this article. While I'm not confident in my ability to write the section on my own, I do offer my services in editing for tone. I can tell from the discussion that this is an emotionally charged subject, but it is imperative that a Wikipedia article present the facts from a neutral standpoint.
The fact is, many Asian Americans and other minorities have very few Asian heroes they can identify with. The casting of white actors in the main roles is of huge significance to them, even if it seems dismissible by the Caucasian majority. The controversy also has an important place in the history of racism in Hollywood and elsewhere. There is no sound reason to omit a "Controversy" section.
I stress again, however, that we must be careful to leave out emotionally charged statements, as an activist point of view has no place in an encyclopedia. Minetruly ( talk) 14:56, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Who is the dragon in the trailer, and who provides his voice? Is this a major character and should it be listed as such? 75.89.129.153 ( talk) 20:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
He is in the spirit world and gives aang advice, kinda like roku did in the show. I dont think he has a name in the movie.
Nope, no name was given.Just referred to as a dragon spirit, and the animation was reused when Aang (or Uung as the actors pronounced his name) went to see it again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbmoyes ( talk • contribs) 04:52, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Suki does not appear in the final cut of the movie. if someone could find a source that states that she was going to be in it, but was cut out for time or whatever, that would be the best
"The film has received mostly negative reviews from American critics. Review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reports that only 8% of critics in the country have given the film a positive review based on 128 reviews, with an average score of 2.8/10.[83] Among Rotten Tomatoes' "Top Critics", which consists of popular and notable critics from the top newspapers, websites, television and radio programs, the film holds an overall approval rating of 7%, based on a sample of 29 reviews.[84] The site's general consensus is that "Despite flashy special effects, The Last Airbender squanders the potential of its popular source material on an incomprehensible plot, laughable dialogue, and a joyless sense of detachment."[85] Another aggregator, Metacritic, gave the film a "generally unfavorable" weighted mean score of 20 based on 32 reviews." (They are slight changes that can hold peace while opinions from the rest of the world weigh in. Also could we mention that Shyamalan was currently the most (how can I put this) hated director by critics around the time of its release? ExplosionsHurtPeople ( talk) 04:50, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Any chance we could have this sentence translated into English: "Arriving to Southern Water Tribe, Zuko demands the elderly under the impression that Avatar is an old person until Aang is found."? Cottonshirt τ 10:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
The longstanding text in the "Sequels" section read like it came straight out of an M. Night fan page. In my opinion, given that the sequel has not been greenlit yet, at this point, all you need to know are three things: (1) he's got a rough draft of Book II, (2) he would like to make it if it's greenlit, and (3) he's not sitting at home waiting for the call. It's not his top priority now; making his next thriller is. Erik-the-red ( talk) 02:06, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
"The casting of White actors in the Asian-influenced Avatar universe triggered negative reactions from some fans marked by accusations of racism, a letter-writing campaign, and various protests."
Noah Ringer is not White so what is this sentence talking about? Noah Ringer is American Indian. >>> http://popwatch.ew.com/2010/11/03/noah-ringer-last-airbender-cowboys-aliens/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.3.142.189 ( talk) 20:29, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: − Jhenderson 777 18:45, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
I would probably close this debate myself. With all the IP editor contributions definitely in the reception section, my faith of this staying a good article is getting less slim. Opinions on how it can be a good article are still welcome though. − Jhenderson 777 20:44, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
-- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 23:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
In the series, the characters were able to actually create fire. However, in the film, they had to have fire on hand in order to bend it. They were not able to actually create it. Although, according to Ozai, it was possible with the power of Sozin's Comet. I have searched high and low (no pun intended) on this article and there is no mention of this at all whatsoever. Please, tell me if you thinkk this should be added. I, for one, think it's crucial.
Monster Rancher the Great (Play Monster Rancher!) 00:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Monster Rancher the GreatMonster Rancher the Great (Play Monster Rancher!) 00:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monster Rancher the Great ( talk • contribs)
Hrmm...good point. The differences are endless. However, I stick by my belief that this one stands out especially. If this one is not added, however, there is one that I think is unquestionably improtant-they start a rebellion to take back captured Earth Kingdom towns. In the series, there is NONE of that. As a matter of fact, the only time I can remember a town being taken back in the 1st season was in "Imprisoned," and that was not even done by Aang, Katara, and Sokka. That was done by Haru and Tyro. That's just the only time I can think of. I'm sick, tired, and my brain is barely functioning. Anyways, reply, respond, dispute, whatever. This is just my 2 cents.
Monster Rancher the Great (Play Monster Rancher!) 22:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Monster Rancher the GreatMonster Rancher the Great (Play Monster Rancher!) 22:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monster Rancher the Great ( talk • contribs)
Copying this over from the main article, as it's both WP:OR and WP:INDISCRIMINATE.
Clconway ( talk) 02:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Why all the hating? In this movie Slimealien finally joined epic fail with epic suck. Isn't that enough achievement in itself? -- 92.202.1.6 ( talk) 00:01, 2 July 2011 (UTC) That's not exactly an acchievement anyone should be proud of. I haven't seen the movie, but I wonder what the makers of the movie were thinking. WHy in god's name would you choose M. Night Shamalan for the director when he hasen't made a single half-decent movie since 2004. He started with such promise, but he's basically become another Ed Wood. Lots of enthusiasm, but not a whole lot of actual talent. If he had talent he wouldn't be overusing the "twist" plot device in every single movie. 74.198.151.58 ( talk) 22:09, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
In the Award Section, under the Golden Raspberry Award for "Worst Eye-Gouging Mis-Use of 3D" it has the works of Philip K. Dick... I do believe that this is an error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.98.206.253 ( talk) 06:21, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Admittedly I could have missed this because I only scanned the "Reception" section, but why is there no mention of the movie-goer reception to the movie? Or reception from fans of the TV show? CRRays Head90 | We Believe! 07:13, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
On Avatar Wiki it says that Shyamalan is also writing and preparing "The Last Airbender 2", despite negative criticism. A 3rd movie is also planned. So should the sequel section be updated? -- 124.169.226.110 ( talk) 04:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
You see what the name of this site is? It's called WIKIpedia. WIKI means you can EDIT. If you feel something should be added in, add it. Putting it in the talk page just wastes your time.-- 198.209.161.201 ( talk) 13:30, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
At the time the article was protected so I couldn't edit it. -- 58.7.232.156 ( talk) 09:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
I changed up the order of reception block in order to make it easier to read. I also added some reviewer's comments to show more of a balance between critic's and average people's reviews. I'm not sure about the format after each review comment. Anybody have an idea to spruce that up? Dive7 0 ( talk) 02:38, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
There's a worst movie The Last Airbender movie missing in The worst movie section. I have been trying to add The Last Airbender 2010 movie in Films considered the worst but every time I do add it on, it gets deleted. But I know for sure that The Last Airbender movie was rated the worst in film history and it won many razzle awards. I tried to make it professional to a neutral viewpoint but I'm not used to typing professional articles. I need help in adding The Last Airbender to be included in Films considered the worst I really want it included in Films considered the worst because The Last Airbender was criticized by both movie critics and Last Airbender cartoon fans. Please work out a deal with the wikipedia user that's in charge of films considered the worst or at least type an acceptable article on The Last Airbender and include it in Films considered the worst because all of us wikipedia users are ready for it to be included in The worst movie article and I'm ready for it. Don't get me wrong I enjoyed The Last Airbender cartoon TV show but I was disappointed with the movie changes because it felt boring and too serious. I did like James Newton Howards music it was great but the movie itself could've been better. CrosswalkX ( talk) 00:39, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Not too sure if that section on the article is entirely relevant -- perhaps a summing up of that section (or maybe even the Reception section) is enough? -- Adrian Dakota ( talk) 16:17, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
I know that many people have been trying to add "The Last Airbender" to the " List of films considered the worst," and it has finally been accepted as such. Should we add a "See Also" section to this article? 76.173.178.162 ( talk) 05:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:The Last Airbender (film)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
2 images. 108 citations. We don't say that the film is bad. JJ98 ( Talk) 10:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC) |
Last edited at 10:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC). Substituted at 20:51, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. ( non-admin closure) Red Slash 01:44, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
The Last Airbender →
The Last Airbender (film) – Move this page to The Last Airbender (film) or The Last Airbender (2010 film) and redirect The Last Airbender to the main show Avatar: The Last Airbender. The Last Airbender is used to refer to the main show Avatar: The Last Airbender like how The Empire Strikes Back is used to refer to the main film Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back. The 2010 film should be titled The Last Airbender (film) or The Last Airbender (2010 film) (for if they were to reboot the Avatar: The Last Airbender film series).
Light2Shadow (
talk)
07:37, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
There should be lots more in this article about the reaction from the series creators. They don't talk about it often, but they did an interview here: http://www.nerdist.com/pepisode/nerdist-writers-panel-154-legend-of-korraavatar-the-last-airbender/ where they discuss it at length, describing how they had a major falling-out with Night, gave minimal input which was always ignored, and called it a "catastrophe". But I can't tell who's who when they're talking together. Maybe someone else can add some of this in? Staecker ( talk) 15:52, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Modifying the sentence that talks about Noah Ringer studying Taekwondo. Since TKD is a martial art of of BOTH North and South Korea, it should be be noted as "Korea", not North or South.
Rayghost Use way as no way; Use limitation as no limitation ( talk) 14:49, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Peach114 has increased every character's age without explanation. I don't know if that's valid or not, because I don't know where the existing ages in the article came from. If there are sources for the character's ages, those should be included. If not, the ages should be removed. Reach Out to the Truth 16:34, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
The Last Airbender. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
The production companies were unsourced, so I added a citation for them ( diff). This is to the American Film Institute. Crazybob2014 blanked the source and restored the unsourced production companies ( diff). I reverted him ( diff), and he reverted me back ( diff). I would like to restore the reliably sourced production companies and remove the unsourced ones. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 19:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
I saw an IP editor screwing with the production companies and went back to the AFI's database entry, which was already in the article. I forgot about this discussion on the talk page, since there was no source for the production companies. Once I remembered, I cited the BFI source above for the production companies, which seemed to be the consensus. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 05:00, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on The Last Airbender. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The Special Effects section sounds like promotional material from ILM. Should be cleaned up and shortened. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.233.10.80 ( talk) 08:51, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
I recently made a small edit, adding the word "parody" before the phrase "Golden Raspberry Awards" in the second paragraph of the lead section. I did this because, when I read the lead section for the first time, I personally found it confusing and had to click on the blue link to Golden Raspberry Awards in order to understand what was actually being said. But this edit was just reversed by an anonymous editor (109.77.209.211), on the grounds that "parody is not quite the right word," even though we currently call the awards a "parody" in the main Golden Raspberry Awards article. I think 109.77.209.211's reversal of my edit was rather silly and that the lead section reads better with the clarification. If there's no objection, I'll undo their reversal in the next day or so. Montgolfière ( talk) 03:31, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
There were a lot of dead links in the article. At some point these links were replaced with Archive URLs from the the Web Archive. Unfortunately someone thought these references were dead and a whole lot of them were removed from the article.
It is possible that this was an honest mistake because sometimes the Web Archive can be very slow and it is possible that people might not have been able to connect to the archive copy at that time, but in any case the archive copies are working now.
I restored a small part of what was erroneously deleted [1] but there is so much more that should not have been deleted and should be restored. -- 109.78.211.26 ( talk) 01:09, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
I'm looking to collaborate with people to create a neutral and informative section describing the racial controversy.
I've been following this controversy for a few months. It is prudent to give it its own section in this article. While I'm not confident in my ability to write the section on my own, I do offer my services in editing for tone. I can tell from the discussion that this is an emotionally charged subject, but it is imperative that a Wikipedia article present the facts from a neutral standpoint.
The fact is, many Asian Americans and other minorities have very few Asian heroes they can identify with. The casting of white actors in the main roles is of huge significance to them, even if it seems dismissible by the Caucasian majority. The controversy also has an important place in the history of racism in Hollywood and elsewhere. There is no sound reason to omit a "Controversy" section.
I stress again, however, that we must be careful to leave out emotionally charged statements, as an activist point of view has no place in an encyclopedia. Minetruly ( talk) 14:56, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Who is the dragon in the trailer, and who provides his voice? Is this a major character and should it be listed as such? 75.89.129.153 ( talk) 20:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
He is in the spirit world and gives aang advice, kinda like roku did in the show. I dont think he has a name in the movie.
Nope, no name was given.Just referred to as a dragon spirit, and the animation was reused when Aang (or Uung as the actors pronounced his name) went to see it again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbmoyes ( talk • contribs) 04:52, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Suki does not appear in the final cut of the movie. if someone could find a source that states that she was going to be in it, but was cut out for time or whatever, that would be the best
"The film has received mostly negative reviews from American critics. Review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reports that only 8% of critics in the country have given the film a positive review based on 128 reviews, with an average score of 2.8/10.[83] Among Rotten Tomatoes' "Top Critics", which consists of popular and notable critics from the top newspapers, websites, television and radio programs, the film holds an overall approval rating of 7%, based on a sample of 29 reviews.[84] The site's general consensus is that "Despite flashy special effects, The Last Airbender squanders the potential of its popular source material on an incomprehensible plot, laughable dialogue, and a joyless sense of detachment."[85] Another aggregator, Metacritic, gave the film a "generally unfavorable" weighted mean score of 20 based on 32 reviews." (They are slight changes that can hold peace while opinions from the rest of the world weigh in. Also could we mention that Shyamalan was currently the most (how can I put this) hated director by critics around the time of its release? ExplosionsHurtPeople ( talk) 04:50, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Any chance we could have this sentence translated into English: "Arriving to Southern Water Tribe, Zuko demands the elderly under the impression that Avatar is an old person until Aang is found."? Cottonshirt τ 10:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
The longstanding text in the "Sequels" section read like it came straight out of an M. Night fan page. In my opinion, given that the sequel has not been greenlit yet, at this point, all you need to know are three things: (1) he's got a rough draft of Book II, (2) he would like to make it if it's greenlit, and (3) he's not sitting at home waiting for the call. It's not his top priority now; making his next thriller is. Erik-the-red ( talk) 02:06, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
"The casting of White actors in the Asian-influenced Avatar universe triggered negative reactions from some fans marked by accusations of racism, a letter-writing campaign, and various protests."
Noah Ringer is not White so what is this sentence talking about? Noah Ringer is American Indian. >>> http://popwatch.ew.com/2010/11/03/noah-ringer-last-airbender-cowboys-aliens/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.3.142.189 ( talk) 20:29, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: − Jhenderson 777 18:45, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
I would probably close this debate myself. With all the IP editor contributions definitely in the reception section, my faith of this staying a good article is getting less slim. Opinions on how it can be a good article are still welcome though. − Jhenderson 777 20:44, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
-- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 23:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
In the series, the characters were able to actually create fire. However, in the film, they had to have fire on hand in order to bend it. They were not able to actually create it. Although, according to Ozai, it was possible with the power of Sozin's Comet. I have searched high and low (no pun intended) on this article and there is no mention of this at all whatsoever. Please, tell me if you thinkk this should be added. I, for one, think it's crucial.
Monster Rancher the Great (Play Monster Rancher!) 00:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Monster Rancher the GreatMonster Rancher the Great (Play Monster Rancher!) 00:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monster Rancher the Great ( talk • contribs)
Hrmm...good point. The differences are endless. However, I stick by my belief that this one stands out especially. If this one is not added, however, there is one that I think is unquestionably improtant-they start a rebellion to take back captured Earth Kingdom towns. In the series, there is NONE of that. As a matter of fact, the only time I can remember a town being taken back in the 1st season was in "Imprisoned," and that was not even done by Aang, Katara, and Sokka. That was done by Haru and Tyro. That's just the only time I can think of. I'm sick, tired, and my brain is barely functioning. Anyways, reply, respond, dispute, whatever. This is just my 2 cents.
Monster Rancher the Great (Play Monster Rancher!) 22:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Monster Rancher the GreatMonster Rancher the Great (Play Monster Rancher!) 22:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monster Rancher the Great ( talk • contribs)
Copying this over from the main article, as it's both WP:OR and WP:INDISCRIMINATE.
Clconway ( talk) 02:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Why all the hating? In this movie Slimealien finally joined epic fail with epic suck. Isn't that enough achievement in itself? -- 92.202.1.6 ( talk) 00:01, 2 July 2011 (UTC) That's not exactly an acchievement anyone should be proud of. I haven't seen the movie, but I wonder what the makers of the movie were thinking. WHy in god's name would you choose M. Night Shamalan for the director when he hasen't made a single half-decent movie since 2004. He started with such promise, but he's basically become another Ed Wood. Lots of enthusiasm, but not a whole lot of actual talent. If he had talent he wouldn't be overusing the "twist" plot device in every single movie. 74.198.151.58 ( talk) 22:09, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
In the Award Section, under the Golden Raspberry Award for "Worst Eye-Gouging Mis-Use of 3D" it has the works of Philip K. Dick... I do believe that this is an error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.98.206.253 ( talk) 06:21, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Admittedly I could have missed this because I only scanned the "Reception" section, but why is there no mention of the movie-goer reception to the movie? Or reception from fans of the TV show? CRRays Head90 | We Believe! 07:13, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
On Avatar Wiki it says that Shyamalan is also writing and preparing "The Last Airbender 2", despite negative criticism. A 3rd movie is also planned. So should the sequel section be updated? -- 124.169.226.110 ( talk) 04:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
You see what the name of this site is? It's called WIKIpedia. WIKI means you can EDIT. If you feel something should be added in, add it. Putting it in the talk page just wastes your time.-- 198.209.161.201 ( talk) 13:30, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
At the time the article was protected so I couldn't edit it. -- 58.7.232.156 ( talk) 09:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
I changed up the order of reception block in order to make it easier to read. I also added some reviewer's comments to show more of a balance between critic's and average people's reviews. I'm not sure about the format after each review comment. Anybody have an idea to spruce that up? Dive7 0 ( talk) 02:38, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
There's a worst movie The Last Airbender movie missing in The worst movie section. I have been trying to add The Last Airbender 2010 movie in Films considered the worst but every time I do add it on, it gets deleted. But I know for sure that The Last Airbender movie was rated the worst in film history and it won many razzle awards. I tried to make it professional to a neutral viewpoint but I'm not used to typing professional articles. I need help in adding The Last Airbender to be included in Films considered the worst I really want it included in Films considered the worst because The Last Airbender was criticized by both movie critics and Last Airbender cartoon fans. Please work out a deal with the wikipedia user that's in charge of films considered the worst or at least type an acceptable article on The Last Airbender and include it in Films considered the worst because all of us wikipedia users are ready for it to be included in The worst movie article and I'm ready for it. Don't get me wrong I enjoyed The Last Airbender cartoon TV show but I was disappointed with the movie changes because it felt boring and too serious. I did like James Newton Howards music it was great but the movie itself could've been better. CrosswalkX ( talk) 00:39, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Not too sure if that section on the article is entirely relevant -- perhaps a summing up of that section (or maybe even the Reception section) is enough? -- Adrian Dakota ( talk) 16:17, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
I know that many people have been trying to add "The Last Airbender" to the " List of films considered the worst," and it has finally been accepted as such. Should we add a "See Also" section to this article? 76.173.178.162 ( talk) 05:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:The Last Airbender (film)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
2 images. 108 citations. We don't say that the film is bad. JJ98 ( Talk) 10:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC) |
Last edited at 10:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC). Substituted at 20:51, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. ( non-admin closure) Red Slash 01:44, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
The Last Airbender →
The Last Airbender (film) – Move this page to The Last Airbender (film) or The Last Airbender (2010 film) and redirect The Last Airbender to the main show Avatar: The Last Airbender. The Last Airbender is used to refer to the main show Avatar: The Last Airbender like how The Empire Strikes Back is used to refer to the main film Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back. The 2010 film should be titled The Last Airbender (film) or The Last Airbender (2010 film) (for if they were to reboot the Avatar: The Last Airbender film series).
Light2Shadow (
talk)
07:37, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
There should be lots more in this article about the reaction from the series creators. They don't talk about it often, but they did an interview here: http://www.nerdist.com/pepisode/nerdist-writers-panel-154-legend-of-korraavatar-the-last-airbender/ where they discuss it at length, describing how they had a major falling-out with Night, gave minimal input which was always ignored, and called it a "catastrophe". But I can't tell who's who when they're talking together. Maybe someone else can add some of this in? Staecker ( talk) 15:52, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Modifying the sentence that talks about Noah Ringer studying Taekwondo. Since TKD is a martial art of of BOTH North and South Korea, it should be be noted as "Korea", not North or South.
Rayghost Use way as no way; Use limitation as no limitation ( talk) 14:49, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Peach114 has increased every character's age without explanation. I don't know if that's valid or not, because I don't know where the existing ages in the article came from. If there are sources for the character's ages, those should be included. If not, the ages should be removed. Reach Out to the Truth 16:34, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
The Last Airbender. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
The production companies were unsourced, so I added a citation for them ( diff). This is to the American Film Institute. Crazybob2014 blanked the source and restored the unsourced production companies ( diff). I reverted him ( diff), and he reverted me back ( diff). I would like to restore the reliably sourced production companies and remove the unsourced ones. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 19:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
I saw an IP editor screwing with the production companies and went back to the AFI's database entry, which was already in the article. I forgot about this discussion on the talk page, since there was no source for the production companies. Once I remembered, I cited the BFI source above for the production companies, which seemed to be the consensus. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 05:00, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on The Last Airbender. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The Special Effects section sounds like promotional material from ILM. Should be cleaned up and shortened. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.233.10.80 ( talk) 08:51, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
I recently made a small edit, adding the word "parody" before the phrase "Golden Raspberry Awards" in the second paragraph of the lead section. I did this because, when I read the lead section for the first time, I personally found it confusing and had to click on the blue link to Golden Raspberry Awards in order to understand what was actually being said. But this edit was just reversed by an anonymous editor (109.77.209.211), on the grounds that "parody is not quite the right word," even though we currently call the awards a "parody" in the main Golden Raspberry Awards article. I think 109.77.209.211's reversal of my edit was rather silly and that the lead section reads better with the clarification. If there's no objection, I'll undo their reversal in the next day or so. Montgolfière ( talk) 03:31, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
There were a lot of dead links in the article. At some point these links were replaced with Archive URLs from the the Web Archive. Unfortunately someone thought these references were dead and a whole lot of them were removed from the article.
It is possible that this was an honest mistake because sometimes the Web Archive can be very slow and it is possible that people might not have been able to connect to the archive copy at that time, but in any case the archive copies are working now.
I restored a small part of what was erroneously deleted [1] but there is so much more that should not have been deleted and should be restored. -- 109.78.211.26 ( talk) 01:09, 30 May 2020 (UTC)