From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not encyclopedic enough?

At the moment, this entry reads more like a back-cover blurb intended to tantalise than as an encyclopedia entry. I haven't read the book yet; I'll try to come back and add more when I have, but if there's anyone out there who has read it and can contribute now, that'd be great. Gesso 11:10, 1 June 2006 (UTC) reply

Five years later ;-)
Yes. The infobox is complete. Now I have inserted references to two reviews that are useful. Yet I have tagged {All plot} which remains nearly true and makes a valid point succinctly. -- P64 ( talk) 21:25, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not encyclopedic enough?

At the moment, this entry reads more like a back-cover blurb intended to tantalise than as an encyclopedia entry. I haven't read the book yet; I'll try to come back and add more when I have, but if there's anyone out there who has read it and can contribute now, that'd be great. Gesso 11:10, 1 June 2006 (UTC) reply

Five years later ;-)
Yes. The infobox is complete. Now I have inserted references to two reviews that are useful. Yet I have tagged {All plot} which remains nearly true and makes a valid point succinctly. -- P64 ( talk) 21:25, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook