This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Ahem, ignoring the below in favour of something more relevant and, er, intelligible: Given that The KLF contains far more information on the band than this article - including when they were known as the JAMs - is there some way we can at least give this link more prominence, to direct interested readers in the direction of the fuller article? I'm not sure how best to re-organise it, but if you were looking for the band here, you might miss a whole lot of info there... - IMSoP 20:51, 7 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Throughout Wikipedia I see references to the band abbreviated down to JAMs. Previously, in all other print media in the U.S., and what little I've seen from the U.K., it has been JAMMs. Is this in need of a fix (I'll do it) or is there some canonical reference for why it should only be one M. Note: I have not read The Illuminatus! Trilogy so if that is the source that could be how I (and others) missed it. -- Geoff Capp 11:55, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
I'm wondering if this ought to be changed to a simple dab page? It doesn't say much that isn't in the Illuminatus or KLF articles. -- kingboyk 12:41, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Ahem, ignoring the below in favour of something more relevant and, er, intelligible: Given that The KLF contains far more information on the band than this article - including when they were known as the JAMs - is there some way we can at least give this link more prominence, to direct interested readers in the direction of the fuller article? I'm not sure how best to re-organise it, but if you were looking for the band here, you might miss a whole lot of info there... - IMSoP 20:51, 7 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Throughout Wikipedia I see references to the band abbreviated down to JAMs. Previously, in all other print media in the U.S., and what little I've seen from the U.K., it has been JAMMs. Is this in need of a fix (I'll do it) or is there some canonical reference for why it should only be one M. Note: I have not read The Illuminatus! Trilogy so if that is the source that could be how I (and others) missed it. -- Geoff Capp 11:55, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
I'm wondering if this ought to be changed to a simple dab page? It doesn't say much that isn't in the Illuminatus or KLF articles. -- kingboyk 12:41, 21 February 2006 (UTC)