This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted on 13 January 2013 by reviewer Titodutta ( talk · contribs). Visual arts C‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles C This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Previous content appears to be from summaries and reviews. I am currently reading the book. FigureArtist ( talk) 23:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply

This wiki entry reads exactly like a publishing house's ad page, complete with nice excerpts from reviews. It does not tell me how this book is actually discussed and used in scholarship which might go a long way to prove why this book is important enough to have its own wikipedia page. 147.142.173.226 ( talk) 06:21, 15 July 2019 (UTC) reply