Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week.
Some Dude From North Carolina (
talk) 17:12, 17 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Infobox and lead
The "short description" should go above everything else per
WP:ORDER.
The talk page says the article is written in British English so add
that template.
The link for the BBFC reference had changed and should be updated.
That same reference should also not be in
WP:ALLCAPS.
The second reference the "country" parameter should be properly cited and marked as dead.
Future sections name this a British film, so shouldn't that be mentioned in the infobox?
The budget reference is missing several parameters.
The Box Office Mojo source should go to the summary, not the domestic gross.
@
Isi96: Actually, no. After a long look at the article, I have to fail it per the first note at
WP:GAFAIL. There are simply too many issues with the references that a copy edit would be recommended instead. As someone who tries their best to improve citations, that section in this article is simply too much. Some are missing authors and dates while others are missing access dates and websites altogether, and a thorough review would clearly show why this article is really far from being a GA. It also appears that you have not tried to check or improve the article itself, and your most recent edit was in
2019. So, again, please submit this article for a copyedit and feel free to nominate again when you do, but at this moment, this article has been failed its GAN.
Some Dude From North Carolina (
talk) 23:37, 17 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Hi, thanks for the feedback. I thought the article would be eligible for GA nomination as the WikiProjects had it ranked at B-class.
Isi96 (
talk) 00:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week.
Some Dude From North Carolina (
talk) 17:12, 17 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Infobox and lead
The "short description" should go above everything else per
WP:ORDER.
The talk page says the article is written in British English so add
that template.
The link for the BBFC reference had changed and should be updated.
That same reference should also not be in
WP:ALLCAPS.
The second reference the "country" parameter should be properly cited and marked as dead.
Future sections name this a British film, so shouldn't that be mentioned in the infobox?
The budget reference is missing several parameters.
The Box Office Mojo source should go to the summary, not the domestic gross.
@
Isi96: Actually, no. After a long look at the article, I have to fail it per the first note at
WP:GAFAIL. There are simply too many issues with the references that a copy edit would be recommended instead. As someone who tries their best to improve citations, that section in this article is simply too much. Some are missing authors and dates while others are missing access dates and websites altogether, and a thorough review would clearly show why this article is really far from being a GA. It also appears that you have not tried to check or improve the article itself, and your most recent edit was in
2019. So, again, please submit this article for a copyedit and feel free to nominate again when you do, but at this moment, this article has been failed its GAN.
Some Dude From North Carolina (
talk) 23:37, 17 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Hi, thanks for the feedback. I thought the article would be eligible for GA nomination as the WikiProjects had it ranked at B-class.
Isi96 (
talk) 00:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)reply