This article requires a copy edit. The grammar throughout has several mistakes. Quotations (such as the one at the beginning), commas, and spelling were some of the most common mistakes made in the article. N
The article cites many refs several times throughout, and about 3/4 of its refs are pages in books, which I am not able to check on, which worries me. I can't simply assume good faith. The
Background section's 3rd paragraph needs more citations. N The
Media exposure and legal inquiries section's 3rd-7th paragraphs all need more citations. N
A section called
Escaping from The Hole?! The entire article is completely biased against Scientology. "Over the next three years, the number of people confined in The Hole..." N
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
This article has been nominated for deletion over a dozen times. I don't think the article is very secure. ?
Many Scientology articles have been subject to deletion campaigns and other tactics. This pattern ultimately led to a well known ArbCom case. Andrew32714:39, 15 May 2013 (UTC)reply
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
This article does not meet the GA criteria at the time. I don't think it has the potential to be upgraded to meeting the criteria within a reasonable amount of time.
PrairieKid (
talk)
02:52, 7 April 2013 (UTC)reply
This article requires a copy edit. The grammar throughout has several mistakes. Quotations (such as the one at the beginning), commas, and spelling were some of the most common mistakes made in the article. N
The article cites many refs several times throughout, and about 3/4 of its refs are pages in books, which I am not able to check on, which worries me. I can't simply assume good faith. The
Background section's 3rd paragraph needs more citations. N The
Media exposure and legal inquiries section's 3rd-7th paragraphs all need more citations. N
A section called
Escaping from The Hole?! The entire article is completely biased against Scientology. "Over the next three years, the number of people confined in The Hole..." N
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
This article has been nominated for deletion over a dozen times. I don't think the article is very secure. ?
Many Scientology articles have been subject to deletion campaigns and other tactics. This pattern ultimately led to a well known ArbCom case. Andrew32714:39, 15 May 2013 (UTC)reply
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
This article does not meet the GA criteria at the time. I don't think it has the potential to be upgraded to meeting the criteria within a reasonable amount of time.
PrairieKid (
talk)
02:52, 7 April 2013 (UTC)reply