This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles Economics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is a need to add the opinions of other historians. Also User:Crawiki please take a little more care; use italics and try and avoid too many other careless errors! Rwood128 ( talk) 17:38, 18 November 2017 (UTC) reply

This has already been done. Three or four other commentators as I recall. Crawiki ( talk) 17:42, 18 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Agreed though the overall emphasis is still too much on Fischer. Feel free to remove the banner.