![]() | The Great Otis Redding Sings Soul Ballads has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
March 10, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the album
The Great Otis Redding Sings Soul Ballads features
Redding's first top-ten single? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Otisreddingsoulballads.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hahc21 ( talk · contribs) 04:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
An overall analysis of the article. The first day, the article is read two or more times to identify:
Comments by AJona1992 If I may, the "charts" section (table) needs WP:ACCESS. Also its Billboard 200 not the way it currently is presented. Also there's no need for a "Singles" section this article is about the album not how individual singles performed on weekly charts, this could be expressed in their own section in this article. There are also common words such as "single" and "MP3". Hot 100 is wikilinked twice in the article, please refer Billboard R&B to Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs (it's proper name). Additionally, the infobox "type" needs to be studio album and not album, "length" needs {{ duration}}. Also please look at other model albums. Best, Jona yo! Selena 4 ever 00:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
If I may, I think that some work should be done on the article about accessibility. I'm not very familiar with Otis Redding and soul music, so I think that I can be assimilated to the casual reader who browses through the Otis Redding discography in order to learn about the author and his work. A Good Wikipedia article should be not only well-written, but also accessible to everybody and not only to experts of the matter treated, as stated in WP: WikiProject Albums/Assessment. At the same time, it should not be necessary to read articles in sequence to obtain the basic knowledge to decipher this one. In my opinion and following Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Album article style guide, improvements can be done on accessibility and other issues:
I hope that my observations are helpful for the writer and the reviewer of the article and do not appear too harsh. Good luck and good work! Lewismaster ( talk) 20:45, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm back. I got my second opinion and i will continue with the review. First, little details that might make the article more vicually attractive (they're not on the GA criteria and are not required):
{{quote box}}
os on the recording sectionNothing else by now. I'll make some extra comments later =). --— Hahc21 [ TALK][ CONTRIBS 17:28, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() | The Great Otis Redding Sings Soul Ballads has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
March 10, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the album
The Great Otis Redding Sings Soul Ballads features
Redding's first top-ten single? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Otisreddingsoulballads.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hahc21 ( talk · contribs) 04:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
An overall analysis of the article. The first day, the article is read two or more times to identify:
Comments by AJona1992 If I may, the "charts" section (table) needs WP:ACCESS. Also its Billboard 200 not the way it currently is presented. Also there's no need for a "Singles" section this article is about the album not how individual singles performed on weekly charts, this could be expressed in their own section in this article. There are also common words such as "single" and "MP3". Hot 100 is wikilinked twice in the article, please refer Billboard R&B to Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs (it's proper name). Additionally, the infobox "type" needs to be studio album and not album, "length" needs {{ duration}}. Also please look at other model albums. Best, Jona yo! Selena 4 ever 00:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
If I may, I think that some work should be done on the article about accessibility. I'm not very familiar with Otis Redding and soul music, so I think that I can be assimilated to the casual reader who browses through the Otis Redding discography in order to learn about the author and his work. A Good Wikipedia article should be not only well-written, but also accessible to everybody and not only to experts of the matter treated, as stated in WP: WikiProject Albums/Assessment. At the same time, it should not be necessary to read articles in sequence to obtain the basic knowledge to decipher this one. In my opinion and following Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Album article style guide, improvements can be done on accessibility and other issues:
I hope that my observations are helpful for the writer and the reviewer of the article and do not appear too harsh. Good luck and good work! Lewismaster ( talk) 20:45, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm back. I got my second opinion and i will continue with the review. First, little details that might make the article more vicually attractive (they're not on the GA criteria and are not required):
{{quote box}}
os on the recording sectionNothing else by now. I'll make some extra comments later =). --— Hahc21 [ TALK][ CONTRIBS 17:28, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |