From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reviews

Here are some reviews I found:

First Novel:

First Manga:

Second Manga:

Also I'm pretty sure ANN has some reviews, but it's in maintenance at the moment. AngelFire3423 ( talk) 21:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Characters

I think that someone called that section "malformed" because it's in the form of a list, and such lists are generally not smiled upon by Wikipedia editors. We should try to rework the information into the form of prose; should a separate page be created for the characters from the series (it definitely shouldn't be at this point and probably wouldn't be in the future given notariaty standards) there can be a list at that point since each character would theoretically be the topic of a section. I've started to at least put the information into the form of complete sentences, which should aid in a transition to paragraph form. Others should continue with that effort.-- 76.116.23.153 ( talk) 20:46, 24 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Some what. While prose is better, in the case of this series, which has yet to even establish notability, a separate list would be excessive and pointless. I called it malformed because it is an improperly formatted list, and inappropriately gives the anime undue preference. -- AnmaFinotera ( talk · contribs) 22:34, 24 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Does this link from BB Watch satisfy the notability requirement: http://bb.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/news/14403.html WhisperToMe ( talk) 01:03, 25 April 2009 (UTC) reply
And so the notability issue has been solved. WhisperToMe ( talk) 11:40, 5 May 2009 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reviews

Here are some reviews I found:

First Novel:

First Manga:

Second Manga:

Also I'm pretty sure ANN has some reviews, but it's in maintenance at the moment. AngelFire3423 ( talk) 21:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Characters

I think that someone called that section "malformed" because it's in the form of a list, and such lists are generally not smiled upon by Wikipedia editors. We should try to rework the information into the form of prose; should a separate page be created for the characters from the series (it definitely shouldn't be at this point and probably wouldn't be in the future given notariaty standards) there can be a list at that point since each character would theoretically be the topic of a section. I've started to at least put the information into the form of complete sentences, which should aid in a transition to paragraph form. Others should continue with that effort.-- 76.116.23.153 ( talk) 20:46, 24 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Some what. While prose is better, in the case of this series, which has yet to even establish notability, a separate list would be excessive and pointless. I called it malformed because it is an improperly formatted list, and inappropriately gives the anime undue preference. -- AnmaFinotera ( talk · contribs) 22:34, 24 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Does this link from BB Watch satisfy the notability requirement: http://bb.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/news/14403.html WhisperToMe ( talk) 01:03, 25 April 2009 (UTC) reply
And so the notability issue has been solved. WhisperToMe ( talk) 11:40, 5 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook