Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: VersaceSpace ( talk · contribs) 21:27, 16 April 2021 (UTC) reply

I'll probably finish this review by the end of the day, although I do wonder why the nominator hasn't tended to my nomination of Hot Pink since we completed the fixes he suggested? versacespace leave a message! 21:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lead

• "The Ghost Inside also did well commercially" → "The Ghost Inside was a commercial success"

Background

• Good

Composition and production

• Good

Release and promotion

• Good

Reception

• The sub-sections here should be their own sections

Critical

• Good

Commercial performance and accolades

• Kind of awkward to read but it's fine

Track listing

• There aren't any production credits in the track list

Charts

• Good

References

• Good

Comments

ping me when the fixes are addressed. this article is  On hold. versacespace leave a message! 03:15, 24 April 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Kncny11: just so you know i've finished this versacespace leave a message! 12:00, 7 May 2021 (UTC) reply

✗ Fail for failure to acknowledge my comments or edit this page at all. versacespace leave a message! 16:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC) reply