![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
So I added a staff listing (useful information) and it was deleted as a vanity link. I'm a bit unclear as to why that was. Comments? User:dkaszor
The paper is a significantly large enough precence on campus to warrent a separate page, no need for a merge. User:dkaszor
I deleted the listing of the editor-in-chief history, but my edit was reverted. As such, I figure we should debate the matter here. I consider the section to be ugly, irrelevant, non-notable, disproportionately large, and only for vanity purposes. Gateway editors are typically not notable outside of campus, the editor-in-chief included. If anyone can provide a decent reason for leaving the information in, I'll oblige. Otherwise, If I get no response, I'll delete the section again.-- 96.52.132.224 ( talk) 06:49, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
So I added a staff listing (useful information) and it was deleted as a vanity link. I'm a bit unclear as to why that was. Comments? User:dkaszor
The paper is a significantly large enough precence on campus to warrent a separate page, no need for a merge. User:dkaszor
I deleted the listing of the editor-in-chief history, but my edit was reverted. As such, I figure we should debate the matter here. I consider the section to be ugly, irrelevant, non-notable, disproportionately large, and only for vanity purposes. Gateway editors are typically not notable outside of campus, the editor-in-chief included. If anyone can provide a decent reason for leaving the information in, I'll oblige. Otherwise, If I get no response, I'll delete the section again.-- 96.52.132.224 ( talk) 06:49, 19 August 2008 (UTC)