This article was nominated for deletion on 10 December 2005. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on December 10, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was listed for deletion on 10 December, 2005. The result was speedy keep; not a useful nomination. -- Tony Sidaway| Talk 18:37, 12 December 2005 (UTC) reply

The nomination was useful because it was examining original research claims and was requested by WP:DRV. The speedy keep was obviously impositional. Anyway, the debate is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Form of Preaching (2nd nomination), and the previous AfD, resulting in a deletion of different material is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert of basevorn. - Splash ^talk 00:46, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply