This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Jazz This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool based on the length of the article. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Sorry, I believe that this article should be retained. I feel this band does have some notability due to their time in existence, and the quantity of their recorded works. I appreciate your attention to this article. thanks. -- Steve, Sm8900 ( talk) 14:15, 29 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Unfortunately, neither longevity nor quantity of material is a valid notability criterion as defined at WP:MUSIC. The music notability guidelines outline a number of criteria (of which the subject need only meet one) to allow inclusion. Hopefully there's something there that will apply to this group. [  cycle~ ] ( talk), 16:14, 29 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Ok, I have tried to add some further materials and further references from some music review articles to address these valid concerns. thanks. -- Steve, Sm8900 ( talk) 19:33, 29 December 2008 (UTC) reply