From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Delete Again?

This is only marginally better than the first Fitzhugh article. It still lacks notability and has a COI problem. Can it be fixed? I doubt it, but I am open to any argument. Dethlock99 ( talk) 17:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply


How would someone go about fixing the page? There are sources, and sure, there's a conflict of interest, so what does that mean? Should someone without a conflict of interest go in and edit it? Please explain. 207.167.19.157 ( talk) 21:07, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply


Hi there, I live in Jasper and aws just browsing and took a look at the Fitz page. Cleaned it up a little. I don't have a conflict of inteerst with the subejct, if that helps. Zigfarria ( talk) 22:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Delete Again?

This is only marginally better than the first Fitzhugh article. It still lacks notability and has a COI problem. Can it be fixed? I doubt it, but I am open to any argument. Dethlock99 ( talk) 17:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply


How would someone go about fixing the page? There are sources, and sure, there's a conflict of interest, so what does that mean? Should someone without a conflict of interest go in and edit it? Please explain. 207.167.19.157 ( talk) 21:07, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply


Hi there, I live in Jasper and aws just browsing and took a look at the Fitz page. Cleaned it up a little. I don't have a conflict of inteerst with the subejct, if that helps. Zigfarria ( talk) 22:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook