This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for merging with Extended mind thesis on the 26th of June 2019. The result of the discussion ( permanent link) was Merge. |
Does Logan's work really belong here? Clark deals with the issue of language extensively in his books (2001, 2003, 2008), and if language is discussed at all in this article that seems the more appropriate discussion. More importantly, Clark and Chalmer's extended mind thesis is epistemological in nature, and the relationship to language discussed in this article seems tenuously related without further elaboration. The discussion of Chomsky's LAD is entirely inappropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.222.134.159 ( talk) 17:07, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
I have undone the deletion on the basis of AndyClark's reference to my Extended Mind work in Chapts 3 and 4 of his recent book Supersizing the Mind : Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. I suggest that the unsigned deleter defer to Clark and leave the text alone until some other reader finds my addition offensive and is willing to sign their post. Logan1939 ( talk) 14:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Is this article about the book by Logan? If so, why only mention the book's full title and author in the last paragraph? If it's about the concept of the extended mind, then it shouldn't start by saying "The Extended Mind is a book in the field of philosophy of mind". If this article is only about the book, maybe someone should start an article about the concept.VirtualDave 05:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by VirtualDave ( talk • contribs)
Hi, I have two remarks about this topic. (a) Why is there wikipedia in the See Also section? (b) and secondly, there should be a critique added, on this thesis. A great example (and online available) is the critique of Jerry Fodor: see Jerry Fodor - Where is my mind?. I thought that critique was quite convincing. Why I am not adding/editing it myself? Mostly because I'm not a native English speaker. 91.176.9.71 ( talk) 08:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
I've added some academic backing to this article (especially citations), but it seems to me too that it needs to be two articles, one on The Extended Mind edited by Richard Menary and one on The Extended Mind Thesis (EMT). As things stand, there is only the two-line lead about the former; the remainder of the article is about the EMT. Hong12kong ( talk) 21:55, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
This page might be improved by including a section on "Implications" or "Applications" of the extended mind idea, in much the same way that the page on, say, game theory, includes "General and applied uses". For instance, what are the implications and applications for the following components of mind: consciousness, memory, cognition and the initiation of behaviour and speech?
In short, it seems as if there is abundant evidence of how the human mind has been and is being extended by various intangible methods, software and hardware. Yet this page is relatively thin on content. I would like to see this page expanded but I'm new to Wikipedia and I'm not sure of how to proceed. BarryKayton ( talk) 17:27, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Inasmuch as there is already the WP article Extended cognition, the present article is presumably about the paper:
reprinted as:
{{
cite book}}
: |editor=
has generic name (
help)and available on line as:
According to WP Manual of Style the title should be italicized. Brews ohare ( talk) 16:29, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
I have rearranged the article to present the material in this light. Brews ohare ( talk) 16:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for merging with Extended mind thesis on the 26th of June 2019. The result of the discussion ( permanent link) was Merge. |
Does Logan's work really belong here? Clark deals with the issue of language extensively in his books (2001, 2003, 2008), and if language is discussed at all in this article that seems the more appropriate discussion. More importantly, Clark and Chalmer's extended mind thesis is epistemological in nature, and the relationship to language discussed in this article seems tenuously related without further elaboration. The discussion of Chomsky's LAD is entirely inappropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.222.134.159 ( talk) 17:07, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
I have undone the deletion on the basis of AndyClark's reference to my Extended Mind work in Chapts 3 and 4 of his recent book Supersizing the Mind : Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. I suggest that the unsigned deleter defer to Clark and leave the text alone until some other reader finds my addition offensive and is willing to sign their post. Logan1939 ( talk) 14:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Is this article about the book by Logan? If so, why only mention the book's full title and author in the last paragraph? If it's about the concept of the extended mind, then it shouldn't start by saying "The Extended Mind is a book in the field of philosophy of mind". If this article is only about the book, maybe someone should start an article about the concept.VirtualDave 05:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by VirtualDave ( talk • contribs)
Hi, I have two remarks about this topic. (a) Why is there wikipedia in the See Also section? (b) and secondly, there should be a critique added, on this thesis. A great example (and online available) is the critique of Jerry Fodor: see Jerry Fodor - Where is my mind?. I thought that critique was quite convincing. Why I am not adding/editing it myself? Mostly because I'm not a native English speaker. 91.176.9.71 ( talk) 08:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
I've added some academic backing to this article (especially citations), but it seems to me too that it needs to be two articles, one on The Extended Mind edited by Richard Menary and one on The Extended Mind Thesis (EMT). As things stand, there is only the two-line lead about the former; the remainder of the article is about the EMT. Hong12kong ( talk) 21:55, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
This page might be improved by including a section on "Implications" or "Applications" of the extended mind idea, in much the same way that the page on, say, game theory, includes "General and applied uses". For instance, what are the implications and applications for the following components of mind: consciousness, memory, cognition and the initiation of behaviour and speech?
In short, it seems as if there is abundant evidence of how the human mind has been and is being extended by various intangible methods, software and hardware. Yet this page is relatively thin on content. I would like to see this page expanded but I'm new to Wikipedia and I'm not sure of how to proceed. BarryKayton ( talk) 17:27, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Inasmuch as there is already the WP article Extended cognition, the present article is presumably about the paper:
reprinted as:
{{
cite book}}
: |editor=
has generic name (
help)and available on line as:
According to WP Manual of Style the title should be italicized. Brews ohare ( talk) 16:29, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
I have rearranged the article to present the material in this light. Brews ohare ( talk) 16:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)